hostops

joined 11 months ago
[โ€“] hostops@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

Maybe he is just feeding your arguments to AI and you argue with AI instead of him. ๐Ÿ˜

But yes. As others have stated, you argue opinions. Not facts. And neither of you is really correct. You value different things. For example he values progress more than authors copyrights. And I find his points you mentioned valid. As are yours.

I however believe, you can agree on any topic with a "smart/sane enough" person with "enough time/motivation" and "similar enough values" as you if you are also such a person.

In that case one or the other will change his mind.

Those conditions are rarely met and the most important part is you also have to be open to changing your mind.

[โ€“] hostops@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago

It does not look lopensource. So it should not be recommended in this community.

[โ€“] hostops@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Prince of Persia

[โ€“] hostops@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

What about my good day? I am right handed.

[โ€“] hostops@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

MicroG version of lineage. Graphene is obviously way supperior.

[โ€“] hostops@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Still discusting.

[โ€“] hostops@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

Some functionality is covered by cryptpad. And some by protonmail.

[โ€“] hostops@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What is the alternative?

[โ€“] hostops@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I use MicroG LineageOS which is in my opinion comparable with graphene os and is supported by a lot more devices.

https://lineage.microg.org/

[โ€“] hostops@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

But the reasoning stays the same.

[โ€“] hostops@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  1. Optimistic person. And if saying "this idea might just work" encourages people you love to try things, then it also helps people you love.
  2. We could debate on what "overly" means. If you believe you will win the lottery this is just stupid and naive, but if you believe you can start a profitable restaurant this is not overly optimistic. Still you must not be stupid when trying.
  3. This is debatable. This statement is very broad.
  4. Correct if you are realistic and not pessimistic. My hot take should be formed: "People who claim are realists are most often just pessimists, who will pass all ideas as bad". Actually to continue from here we should exactly define all the words we are using. And in this case it would not be a hot take anymore. Also I believe to decide to try and take interview you must feel optimistic about it instead of pessimistic.

My hot take is targeting "realists" who say: "Your idea is bad. Do not pursue it. I am just being realistic." Even though their idea has maybe small but fair chance of succeeding. This is just discouragement - which is more often seen in pessimists.

Actually at this point I do not even know enough about words and definitions to continue.

I think we should actively try to encourage each other to act, also by believing in others ideas (still do not believe in winning the lottery).

 

Edit: Question based on DMA: element.io/blog/the-eu-digital-markets-act-is-here/

 

I just became dad last month. So from more experienced fathers: What are best ways to express love to your family?

view more: next โ€บ