Forneus
“ This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2013)”
So true, Wikipedia.
Forneus
“ This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2013)”
So true, Wikipedia.
Finally. I'm part of the Cool Gang.
Your effortpost is appreciated.
I remember having this sort of conversation 20 years ago, and it didn't convince me then.
Me asserting copyright means I can express myself however I want, and Nazis can get their images from Unsplash or make it themselves. There's no risk of complicity on my part.
I only saw it because I follow him on Masto.
Fedi is weird.
I happen to copyright my output (obviously not here or in other comments). The question I ask myself is: would I be ok if a Nazi organization used my photos in their propaganda? I'm not ok with that, so I like to retain control over who can use my stuff. If someone acceptable were to ask me, I'd let them use my work without compensation.
I realized Twitter was for weirdo wonks when the local "Idol" reality show just had IG links for the contestants (Sweden). There might be markets where Twitter is locally bigger, but in Sweden it was always a niche thing.
I got boosted by Charlie Stross...
Web 3.5.1 - web for workgroups
"Deep tech startup" == very good at digging deep in public infrastructure funds, presumably
rabbit data breach: all r1 responses ever given can be downloaded
AI continues to be going great...