gasgiant

joined 1 year ago
[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 weeks ago

I could be wrong but I seem to remember this is one of the reasons why the baskets have a net.

You're not allowed to do that but if the net wasn't there then in pre-video games the refs might not be able to spot if the ball went up through the hoop.

Think they were also to stop players reaching up through the hoop to defend as well.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

So you know brioche buns should be ever so slightly sticky, but a sweet sticky, right?

Not to ruin your favourite burger place but maybe you should just buy some buns from a bakers and then see what they're like fresh.

At the moment there are two options. You can't quite tell the difference between brioche sticky and greasy sticky or your burger place manages to get grease all over your buns.

How good are they overall? Do you want to know the answer?

Edit: Damn it came to me just too late. At the moment you're stuck in Heisenberg's buns. Do you want to resolve that?

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Only if they didn't report such a message/activity and fully cooperate.

My understanding is that if you are party to things like this and don't take the required action then you are liable to this wider definition of making.

So you are essentially complicit in the making of them because you didn't try and stop/report it in a timely manner.

Happens with loads of other stuff like murders, terror, theft etc... Basically if you know about serious crimes and don't take any action. Then you can be found guilty of a very similar offence as the people who committed the exact offence.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Did you read the recall? Again it says hood latch switch deformation.

That may be part of the hood latch assembly but again at no point does it say that the latch not latching is the issue. Only the reporting of the latching state.

You're really rather pathetic and I'm certainly no fan of Tesla or Musk. A brief check of my previous posts would confirm this.

As you're obviously not very good at reading or understanding things then that fact probably did slip by you. You seem to be only capable of latching (you might not see what I did there being a bit dense) onto certain words without understanding the full issue.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Nope it's the latch switch. So something that is switched when the latch is closed. Not the latch itself.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Read it again. It's deformation of the hood latch switch. Not the hood latch.

Thanks for further confirming my point that you're not reading it correctly

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And what is the next word after the bit you have quoted?

Is it by any chance switch.

The full quote is deformation of the hood latch switch. Not the hood latch.

Thanks for further confirming my point that you're not reading it correctly.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (13 children)

The comments read like a lot of people don't quite understand the issue.

The bonnet (hood if you insist) latch may not warn a driver if it isn't secured correctly. If it is secured correctly then it is fine. So it isn't going to suddenly open.

If the latch isn't shut correctly and then the sensor doesn't report this then the bonnet may open unexpectedly.

If they can use a software update to correct the reporting then that's it fixed.

There's no issue with the actual latching mechanism. It's just the sensor for reporting the latching state.

It may be that it currently works on a two value system. i.e a value for correctly latched and a value for not latched. If that's the case and isn't just not providing the second valve correctly then a simple software change to only use the latched value would fix this. As any other value or the absence of a value will report it at unlatched.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I've also heard that it's a real crazy show where anything goes.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I bet there's always a lot of fun at his house as well.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I presume you're joking. That was a one time minor deduction from thousands.

I can't believe Sunderland are in there for so long. Had no idea they'd been that consistent prior to the 80/90s and I'm a Newcastle fan.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

His parents were a GP and owned a pharmacy. They just didn't get it for him/them for whatever reason.

They certainly could have afforded it if they wanted to.

There's a massive difference between just not having something as a child and not even being able to afford it at all.

I love these Tory twat stories where they try to relate to normal people. They're so far off the mark it highlights just how clueless they are about real life.

view more: ‹ prev next ›