froztbyte

joined 1 year ago
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 4 months ago

coming up on 18y on mine. my postfix config is almost of legal drinking age in a lot of countries.

modern email ecosystem is a fucking mess.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 9 points 4 months ago

too high or too low

trick question everyone knows this late on a friday you want a body high for that nice mellow low feeling

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 10 points 4 months ago

"I said good day, sir. good day!" [walks through revolving door]

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

no, you utter fucking clown. they're literally posting to take the piss out of you, the only person in the room who isn't getting that everyone is laughing at them, not with them

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 11 points 4 months ago

you should speak to a physicist, they might be able to find a way your density can contribute to science

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 9 points 4 months ago

but it's apache2 sega! tooooootes freebies!

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 7 points 4 months ago

re fastmail, david mentioned a thing I wasn't aware of so they're off the list now, more or less just going to forget they exist except as a counter-recommendation

this comes across to me as an understandable (and fairly honest) compromise, that is probably adequate for some threat models?

they're sorta saying "yeah just use external GPG like before"

albeit I will say their reasoning is a bit fucked in the head imo: that "if you can't trust the server" shit applies equally for whether it's serving you up the page elements to do message cryptography, or whether it's serving you up a normal webmail client. I think I know/understand where they meant to go with it, but the wording they picked is quite shit

I set up a tuta domain for a thing about a month ago. it could've been a bit smoother (esp. domain/dns state checks) but I didn't find anything immediately jarringly bad - and I was even drunk at the time (which means my diy-able supergrump comes out about this sort of shit). will see how it goes over some longer use :)

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (10 children)

I've read the article you've posted: it does not refute the fucking datapoint provided, it literally DOES NOT EVEN MENTION MISTRAL AT ALL.

so all I can tell you is to take your pearlclutching tantrum bullshit and please fuck off already

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 9 points 4 months ago

the reading comprehension of a llm and the contextual capacity of a gnat

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 14 points 4 months ago (23 children)

Mistral’s Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1 produced copyrighted content on 22% of the prompts.

did you know that a lesser-known side effect of the infinite monkeys approach is that they will produce whole sections of copyright content abso-dupo-lutely by accident? wild, I know! totes coinkeedink!

I’d be glad to provide it once you’ve come to your senses and want to discuss things like an adult

jesus fucking christ you must be a fucking terrible person to work with

I've seen toddlers throw more mature tantrums

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 12 points 4 months ago (5 children)

EU funding cuts to OSS programs in the wake of popularity of Copyright-Unsafe Clippy field

they just really need those GPU hours more than you need to pay for developers or maintainers. I’m sure you understand.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 20 points 4 months ago (4 children)

ah fuck I wasn’t aware of this, thanks for mentioning

off the list they go

view more: ‹ prev next ›