other Tschaikovsky (Adrian)
froztbyte
while that's also a problem, doesn't really seem that's what happened here
Tschaikovsky reader detected?
you appear to be lost, this isn’t “sama stan club”
and by library I hope you don’t mean a place of knowledge other humans rely on
I scrubbed through this video to see if it included handling/inserting a SIM card, it didn't. gonna presume eSIM. probably the deal guess - they signed some kind of special-APN deal with t-mo to get it live, didn't think they'd need to port (or let t-mo have preferential timeframe, or somesuch), and just never implemented it
also, in this video at about 13:10, some hilarious footage: trying to show the shitty projection, entirely out of focus, in a room already-dark to try capture the contrast.... because it has that little luminance on the project (which is duh, because battery device)
many, many lols
this includes "It’s a standalone device with its own SIM card" but it doesn't make clear whether eSIM or hard-sim
also, that's a snip quote. the full quote is:
It’s a standalone device with its own SIM card, and there’s no screen — just vibe
just amazing
I haven't read into it at all so treat this as pure speculation, but from context: the t-mo thing sounds/smells like MNO lock on the SIM service. a lot of operators offer subset-services type products (e.g. SIMs with only data services, SIMs that only work within a specific localized network, etc etc), and I could see this maybe having been launched with something like that
I'm unfortunately not current enough on the technical implementation of eSIM (especially wrt issuance and HLR interaction) to make a guess as to how this would impact if it were eSIM vs hard SIM
love how they edited their comment to be "more specific" and just made it even worse
my armchair linguist ass loves this post
there’s a whole strain of extreme terribleness in the wider infosec industry ito naming and references, it’s so goddamn bad
the most recently visible form of this is post-heartbleed how lots of researchers/groups now fall over themselves to give vuln publications Branding (logo, catchy name, etc), but also all kinds of other things that they constantly mix some terminology soup up
AWS probably has pre-filled patent documents ready for CloudStrike, just waiting on some acquihire or popular open source thing they can product-leech
you just really don’t get it, do you?