This is great news, but it is always worth remembering the ebb and flow of these things. It happens because an individual cared. Eventually, that individual won't be in the decision-making process, and the office will likely come back. At least it usually goes thst way.
Shockingly I'm also mad about that. I suppose you support that situation?
Let's not describe this as "paying valve three bucks" because that's not accurate and is misleading.
It's paying valve 30% of your revenue.
What's the efficiency in taking 30% of almost all game sales on a platform? I know we all love valve, but the efficiency here is having a store that everyone has to use if they want to make sales at all.
How are you going to fund thr shitty projects again?
I'm saying it's not just "not easy", it's impossible unless you are an already established entity that has some cards to hold in negotiations.
Put yourself in the position of a new company, you've a great idea, a great team. How are you going to fund development in 2024?
If the implication is that they should be negotiating better terms. Well, good luck with that. I've been a part of many teams involved with investor negotiations. You need their money a hell of a lot more than they need your teams risk.
Okay, but where's that money coming from? Someone has to upfront pay for things. Larian are lucky, they have a majory investor that was not looking for any control, they released in early access and had runway money from previous projects to go with. They are the exception, not the rule, unfortunately.
Publishers no longer publish third parties for the most part, so everyone who isn't a subsidiary of a large company has to find funding somewhere.
I've been around open source for 20+ years and can tell you right now that it don't work that way. An issue tracker and a wiki is not a community.
Most older open source communities were built on irl connections and irc, with some mailing lists thrown in. Hell, we even funded conferences just around the software, not to sell a product but just because it's good for everyone to be talking to each other.
The issue tracker tracks the status of things, the wiki is generally user focused. It's not where development happens or thinks get built.
Fwiw, the eggs wouldn't have to be more expensive, the eggs cost what the market will pay.
The only change is that the people profiting from your poor food conditions will profit slightly less.
This is a common lie they tell everyone.
I'm so so tired of fucking awful headlines, and the whole "don't editorialize headlines" thing just doesn't work anymore.
“It will be ubiquitous,” Yoshida said. “Wherever there is computing, users will be able to play their favorite games seamlessly. Why PlayStation will remain our core product [is] we will expand our gaming experiences to PC, mobile, and cloud.”
is the actual quote which is functionally what the situation is today. also this guy is in power for less than a year so you can barely listen to him.
Okay, there aren't actually that many frogs in this movie. But there is always a vague croaking sound in the background track so that counts right?
I think the thing that bothers me most about lemmys whirlwind of negativity about everything is that you get people like op, that find something they want to spread negativity about, then they post it to a bunch of communities.
Lemmy is small, so you see this one thing over and over and over again. It's so tiring.
I get that this kind of stuff isn't something to be positive about, I'm just getting so tired of lemmy. At least reddit didn't have a constant stream of negativity. Multiplexed through every subreddit.
I'm convinced it's this kind of thing that's killing the entire thing. You can't build communities on this, so there's less and less people looking every day. I know I look at lemmy a lot less than I used to.