dtrain

joined 1 year ago
[–] dtrain@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

This developer is amazing and does things purely for the love of his game.

[–] dtrain@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Any insight on why this Japanese legal case took 13 years to rule?

[–] dtrain@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

He said yell not greet.

[–] dtrain@lemmy.world 82 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Can it be soundproof too?

[–] dtrain@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Redunda-what?

The only RAID is Zero.

[–] dtrain@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Presuming the children have the means to support their parents and their immediate family.

If not, a tough decision must be made.

[–] dtrain@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Stupid. The cost for flights then was more like beyond first class prices now.

And a lot more smoky.

[–] dtrain@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Keep using it. I’m sure it’ll catch on…

 
0
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by dtrain@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

What are some best practices in mounting NAS shares that you all follow?

Currently I am mounting using fstab to my user’s home directory with full rwx permissions, but that feels wrong.

I’ve read to use the mnt directory or the media directory but opinions differ.

My main concern is I want to protect against inadvertently deleting the contents of the NAS with an errant rm command. And yes I have backups of my NAS too.

Edit: this is a home NAS with 1 user on this Linux PC (the other clients being windows and Mac systems)

Would love to hear everyone’s philosophy! Thanks!