dmalteseknight

I read it as credibility with Russia's citizens. They believed that their government will prevent any attack coming to Russian soil.

Eh when the founders are dead long enough, people stop caring. Ex: Chanel

I want to fight you

God

No they're not!

But style is also part of a person's personality no? I say this as someone who slaps on clothes on themselves more often than not.

I do not understand the dislikes. Your response is quite polite.

I might have worded my comment poorly. I did not mean to insinuate that it was "safer" but that there is more variety. That is, it is easier to find 18th century toaster porn today than back in the 2000s.

The porn landscape has changed quite a bit since the 2000s:

• Accessibility: In those days people had the "family computer" which limited the time you could access porn and had to be extra careful as to not get caught. Nowadays you can see porn on a plethora of devices and can basically see porn 24/7.
• Variety: Nowadays you can find porn for anything and it can get pretty dark. Porn addicts get bored of regular porn and go down a dark rabbit hole. Back in the day you had to make due with what you get or go through a lot of effort to find something you like more.

Mind you I am not saying that porn should be outright banned but there should be barriers in place. Example porn can only use the domain "xxx" so parents can add the filter to the parenting controls of whatever devices. Sure there are ways to circumvent that but it at least takes more effort.

I would guess to see how many people go out of their way to use vscodium over vscode.

Cars are great, car centric societies not so much.

You can't really call lurching forward in traffic "driving".

But wouldn't them buying all the rights to "basically everything" incentivise them more to jack up prices and include ads since the user base has no legal alternatives ?