dipshit

joined 1 year ago
[–] dipshit@lemm.ee 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I do not see the problem necessarily with promoting OF etc as sex workers do have to make money and that is their job, however the less savory people who are attracted by the types of porn I listed above do often have problematic views, so agree with you there.

It would be no different than allowing people to post ads here on Lemmy for Pepsi, Liberty Mutual, and HeGetsUs. If someone made ad accounts to post that shit you'd ban them as an admin, why is OF spam any different to you?

[–] dipshit@lemm.ee 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I agree, cloudflare is evil and antithetical to the idea of Fediverse. #BlockCloudflare

[–] dipshit@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

I just did a few hours ago.

[–] dipshit@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You're free to have your own opinion, I was a reactive angry person. I'm not denying responsibility for what I did back then.

[–] dipshit@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Some shit I made up from a long ass time ago. I got over it and don't rlly care anymore.

[–] dipshit@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

How do I do it in a way that Admins will actually see the reports? Active community mods seem to dismiss reports so they aren't seen and there isn't exactly a way to report it so only admins can see them.

[–] dipshit@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I second that one, lemmynsfw is something else entirely. Not just that it's porn but porn instances attract less savory people, especially bots and OF promoters (which are almost the same thing) so probably would be a good idea to axe them for instance health.

[–] dipshit@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

We don’t want to cut off our community from folks on these instances but if they’re causing a lot of trouble- we can certainly consider it

If that's the case and there is a desire to have community reach maybe older defederations should be re-evaluated. But I wasn't under the impression that it mattered much compared to safety of minority users and security of the instance.

[–] dipshit@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago (11 children)

I mean lemm.ee literally hosts a conservative community, which on occasion features borderline transphobia and homophobia. Right-wing stuff ya know. discuss.online has wide open sign-ups and has regularly had spammers, trolls, and assholes come and go. They are a liability. As far as I can tell Lemmy hasn't gotten substantially better moderation tools since those last two big defederations, so the issues with these servers and servers like them are still valid and apparent.

[–] dipshit@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Probably, I crossposted there as well.

[–] dipshit@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

lemm.ee has !conservative@lemm.ee a community which is allowed to thrive by the main admin of this server. Along with all their users. Does this really seem like a good idea guys?

 

Seriously why? Discuss.online has horrible moderation and open-signups, and Lemm.ee isn't very much better. If lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works were completely nuked to avoid the moderation headache or risks from two large open servers, why aren't lemm.ee and discuss.online banned as well?

 

Seriously why? Discuss.online has horrible moderation and open-signups, and Lemm.ee isn't very much better. If lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works were completely nuked to avoid the moderation headache or risks from two large open servers, why aren't lemm.ee and discuss.online banned as well?

 

Seriously why? Discuss.online has horrible moderation and open-signups, and Lemm.ee isn't very much better. If lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works were completely nuked to avoid the moderation headache or risks from two large open servers, why aren't lemm.ee and discuss.online banned as well?

view more: next ›