Are you complaining that older versions of Java don't have the features of newer versions of Java...?
dandi8
joined 3 months ago
For me, as primarily a backend dev, the argument was that it's a framework, unlike React, so you get an everything-in-one solution which is quite easy to setup and use.
Given that Google still hasn't killed this one yet, it's also a mature platform with plenty of articles online on how to use it.
IIRC the license was also better than React's, at least last time I checked.
Not sure on what the landscape looks like today, but when I was making the choice, the internet didn't seem to consider other solutions to be competitive with either React or Angular.
Over my dead body.
Not sure the son would see it the same way...
FYI there's a fully playable unofficial port for Jak 1 and 2, and they're working on the 3rd one: https://opengoal.dev/
Pegasus?
I feel like I'd believe it if the headline was about John McAfee.
In my experience LLMs do absolutely terribly with writing unit tests.
IMO this perspective that we're all just "reimplementing basic CRUD" applications is the reason why so many software projects fail.
Good abstractions are important for the code to be readable. An AbstractEventHandlerManager is probably not a good abstraction.
The original commenter said that their code was "generic with lot of interfaces and polymorphism" - it sounds like they chose abstractions which hindered maintainability and readability.
Is it possible that you just chose the wrong abstractions?
view more: next βΊ
Then I'd have to assume your religion is also not-believing-in-unicorns and round-earthism, as well as humans-need-oxygenism.
Agnosticism is not a lack of belief, it is a stance that one doesn't know whether a god exists or not. Frequently, the "belief" would be that it's impossible to know, which, by your definition, would also make it a religion.
The argument does not hold up.