d00ery

I didn't remember this specific incidence, but the govt. / media do like to blame that darn ~~rock music~~, ~~mini skirts~~, ~~Doom game~~, ~~horror movie~~ for all the bad things that are happening.

Also, link to this specific incidence https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_Rose#Controversy

Reminds me of Rising Storm 🥲

https://youtu.be/LJQ81a8jPCw?si=yldsidkgYJuOASwD

In Sync for Lemmy app, open the post so you can see the comments, then click on the image for both resolution readability.

Sounds really good, will have to give this a try

Impressive to watch, but shouldn't friendly infantry be in support?

People demanding that "thou shalt not commit adultery" be displayed in school, but have no qualms voting for a convicted adulterer. (Well convicted of lying about paying to try and cover up adultery) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosecution_of_Donald_Trump_in_New_York

I guess "thou shall not steal" and "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour" aren't really a problem either ...

So the mosquitoes just agreed not to cross the border 🦟

I'm pretty sure they did.

Six months after he was first sent to fight, he was struggling with post-traumatic stress disorder [...] Before he was due to redeploy, he took his own life.

The name is British, the fine is dollars ($), so could be a lot of places ..

However, the effect of vitamin and mineral supplements on the risk of non-communicable diseases in “generally healthy” populations is controversial. We examine patterns of supplement use and the evidence on their effects from randomised trials.

to date, randomised trials have largely shown no benefit of vitamin, mineral, and fish oil supplements on the risk of major non-communicable diseases in people without clinical nutritional deficiency. These results contrast with findings from observational studies, where supplemental nutrient intakes are often associated with a reduced risk of these diseases. The apparent associations from observational studies may result from unknown or unmeasured confounding factors such as socioeconomic status and lifestyle factors, including a better overall diet

https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m2511

Their use as general ‘pick-me-ups’ is of unproven value and, in the case of preparations containing vitamin A or D, may actually be harmful if patients take more than the prescribed dose.

https://bnf.nice.org.uk/treatment-summaries/vitamins/

As previously stated there is evidence for and against.

In conclusion, multivitamins were found to enhance immediate free recall memory but no other cognitive domains.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=benefits+of+multivitamins&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1729284229951&u=%23p%3DJVQ1iRSCrVoJ

Neuhouser et al (14) recently provided an excellent summary of observational and clinical trial data on dietary supplements in relation to cancer. For MVM supplements, case-control studies of cancer at various sites (eg, colon, esophagus, stomach, oropharynx, breast, cervix, bladder, prostate, and skin) suggested that benefits may exceed risks. Corresponding cohort study results, however, were mostly consistent with no association

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002916523279101

Conclusion In this large prevention trial of male physicians, daily multivitamin supplementation modestly but significantly reduced the risk of total cancer.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/1380451

I was highlighting the fact that there's evidence for both answers