cone_zombie

joined 2 months ago
[–] cone_zombie@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You didn't adress any of my points though, can you please come out of your bubble?

[–] cone_zombie@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

What if the passenger unbuckles half way through?

[–] cone_zombie@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I'm sorry, but this kind of logic just baffles me. Are you talking out of your ass on this one? If you're driving and I'll jump onto the road right in front of you, will you still be at fault? Where in the world would that be the case? If I come to a factory and stick my hand into a wood chipper that someone was operating and then say "whoever the hell was operating this 5 thousand pound hunk of steel should be at fault now!", would I be correct in my logic?

Think about it this way - if you hadn't been there driving would they have been fine? If so, you caused it, you're at fault

This is next level mental gymnastics. If someone robbed you, think about it this way - if you hadn't been there, none of it would have happened. So maybe you're at fault after all

[–] cone_zombie@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

Here's my take. OP is a girl working at Subway, both her and the guy are 16. The guy is romantically interested, tries to get her attention, does so awkwardly. OP is not interested, tries to excuse it as "being an introvert". Course of action - say you're not interested and move on. In case I'm wrong, disregard this comment.

[–] cone_zombie@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

you won't be banned from say .world for saying the Chinese government is a problem

Because this is literally their agenda. Try saying anything relatively positive or neutral about any of those countries on .world and see how "non-authoritarian" they are

[–] cone_zombie@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

I never knew .ml was banned by other instances. This explains a lot actually

[–] cone_zombie@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

Alright, I'll say it. It's because we're all Russian shills here

[–] cone_zombie@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

¿Por Qué No Los Dos?

[–] cone_zombie@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

We're on the same boat. The meme is very ambiguous, but it roughly means that something happens seemingly without a reason, i.e. the author doesn't understand why something is the way it is

[–] cone_zombie@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Just sang all of it in my head

[–] cone_zombie@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

As a duckduckgo user myself, I haven't noticed any striking differences between the two. Can you explain why it's better? I know google uses AI responses nowadays, but you can just ignore these, no?

[–] cone_zombie@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's very easy to ruin your life while it's much harder to get it straight. I think the whole "you can be anything you want to be" mentality is very idealistic and a product of survivorship bias. It shouldn't stop you from trying by any means, just something to keep in mind.

view more: next ›