chimasterflex

joined 1 year ago
[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

so basically real life

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I would pay to see cart narc take on JD

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

or at least ban things like styrofoam

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

There goes breakfast

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I think you'll find that there's still quite a crowd that would. UBI for sure would help curb the those on the street scene just trying to pay to survive. But there's a huge group of only fans models that do things not to survive, but rather to become ultra wealthy

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Execs are furiously taking notes right now

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

The real issue is putting tomatoes in the fridge.

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Serious question, couldn't you bypass this by just setting up different LLCs that only have one or two properties under them?

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Finally I can put some take into this. I've worked in memory testing for years and I'll tell you that it's actually pretty expected for a memory cell to fail after some time. So much so that what we typically do is build in redundancy into the memory cells. We add more memory cells than we might activate at any given time. When shit goes awry, we can reprogram the memory controller to remap the used memory cells so that the bad cells are mapped out and unused ones are mapped in. We don't probe memory cells typically unless we're doing some type of in depth failure analysis. usually we just run a series of algorithms that test each cell and identify which ones aren't responding correctly, then map those out.

None of this is to diminish the engineering challenges that they faced, just to help give an appreciation for the technical mechanisms we've improved over the last few decades

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

8g sure but this is only within 2% error. most scales would probably be within 3% so this isn't surprising

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

HR should have replied with a "this was a test on how not to be an asshole and you've all failed. You must take the whole training again"

view more: next ›