breadguy

joined 1 month ago
[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 1 points 23 hours ago
[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 4 points 1 week ago

seems pretty good, though I think id still pick Jami over it for p2p

[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 2 points 2 weeks ago

it's probably the best p2p messenger out there

[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 1 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know lol

[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 3 points 3 weeks ago

it is using double ratchet but heres the most recent tob. the fact that they use distributed self hostable relays and no user identifiers is more secure imo

[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 3 points 3 weeks ago

yeah it's annoying, but they're pretty committed to the no user id thing

[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

yeah you can only use one device at a time because simplex doesn't have accounts, just devices. but you can make another account per device and add them to your chats

[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 9 points 3 weeks ago

4 and 5, from what I remember you have to opt into being discoverable by number even if you give it your contacts. that said I don't fw signal for the other reasons stated, it's basically just the easiest secure alternative to texting.

[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 3 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)
  • matrix if you want cloud storage for conversations
  • jami or briar if you're okay with p2p
  • simplex for the most secure cryptography and "just works" better than p2p
[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 19 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

~~most~~ some of the stuff on that list isn't even true (at least not anymore) lol

[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 2 points 3 weeks ago

the meta stuff (fb messenger, ig, whatsapp) always have issues. bridges get flagged as bots, service goes down, etc

view more: next ›