blind3rdeye

joined 1 year ago
[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Nar, I actually know. It's Albo. Slowmo was the previous guy. (And Bazza I just made up.)

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 8 points 2 weeks ago
[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Probably something like Bazza, or Albo, or Slowmo.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

My latest favourite is missing: Note Taking Apps:

Joplin is good for organising text-based notes, so I'm not surprised to see that on your list. But xournal is a for mixed drawing / hand-writing / text, etc. So it's a different use-case to Joplin. (It would be perfect if Joplin supported xournal notes; so that you could write with xournal and then organise with Joplin. ... But that hasn't yet come to pass.)

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I suppose the loss they are referring to is that they fumbled and dropped their cool mystique at a critical moment. How can you put a price on that? ...

Or perhaps they are talking about an accumulated loss. They're basically out there flipping and fumbling coins all day - and after the latest one they've lost the equivalent of $30000 in total.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's what they said in The Matrix. I guess they called it right.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

Free food, but confined to a tiny unchanging living space where your entire purpose is to be observed by others; vs no free food, but more person freedom. Which do you think is better?

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

Probably misinformation. I didn't think Proton was even around in 1896!

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 36 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It was easy to predict a downward slide as soon as they merged with Activision.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

The person is talking about the dating pool they are exposed to. I don't see this as a personal comment about any individual person. I certainly wouldn't take it as a personal attack, and I don't think anyone else should either.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don't see it as a put-down.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah... Civ 1, 2, 3, and 4 were all good - for different reasons. Civ 5 was where the design decisions stopped being about gameplay and started being about maximising profit. Making the game functional and fun was lower priority to making paid DLC. Players buy the buggy and unfinished game... then pay more to fix it piecemeal with the DLC. Such is the power of brands and advertising.

view more: ‹ prev next ›