aoidenpa

joined 1 year ago
[–] aoidenpa@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That's not how it's defined. 0.99.. is the limit of a sequence and it is precisely 1. 0.99.. is the summation of infinite number of numbers and we don't know how to do that if it isn't defined. (0.9 + 0.09 + 0.009...) It is defined by the limit of the partial sums, 0.9, 0.99, 0.999... The limit of this sequence is 1. Sorry if this came out rude. It is more of a general comment.

[–] aoidenpa@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't forget Gorgonzola Larson.

[–] aoidenpa@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

This is amazing.

[–] aoidenpa@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

One more post bro. Bro pls we'll figure out en passant bro. I promise bro just a bigger post bro. One more and we'll solve chess bro. Give me 2048 up votes bro pls bro.

[–] aoidenpa@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

She can break me

[–] aoidenpa@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Check this out. It puts everything I thought that was, you know, more ethical to use to the harmful section and suggests some unknown and probably not very useful today stuff. Can someone explain if they have good points or not?

[–] aoidenpa@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

I recently learned there are people that think emacs and vi are bloated. They like acme or sam or something. Iceberg is so deep.

[–] aoidenpa@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The stories this building could tell...

view more: ‹ prev next ›