antler

joined 5 months ago
[–] antler@feddit.rocks -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Read the Pocket and Mozilla FakeSpot privacy policies. They collect a lot if data, including browsing history, and do so via Google Analytics. They then share that data with advertisers.

[–] antler@feddit.rocks 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Taking other people's creative works to create your own for-profit product is illegal in every way except when AI does it.

No, actually its completely legal to consume content that was uploaded to the internet and then use it as inspiration to create your own works.

[–] antler@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 month ago

Because Mozilla takes a metric shitload of your data via fakespot such as (but not limited to)

Internet or other electronic network activity (e.g., browsing history, search history, information regarding an individual's interaction with an internet website, application, or advertisement, and online viewing activities)

https://www.fakespot.com/privacy-policy

And then sells it to advertisers

[–] antler@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 month ago

apt remove firefox (or via pacman, windows settings etc)

Otherwise should be a bunch of flags you can set in about:config

[–] antler@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 month ago

Lol who the f trusts Mozilla nowadays?

[–] antler@feddit.rocks 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

https://www.fakespot.com/privacy-policy

Internet or other electronic network activity (e.g., browsing history, search history, information regarding an individual's interaction with an internet website, application, or advertisement, and online viewing activities)

Category of Third Parties to Whom Personal Information is Sold and/or Shared: Advertising partners, Service providers

Just a snippet of the privacy policy. There's other bad stuff too like location tracking. It's also all ran through Google analytics.

So much for a privacy respecting Mozilla

[–] antler@feddit.rocks 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Same reason why they serve Lemmy instances despite illegal content on Lemmy: section 230 of the DMCA

[–] antler@feddit.rocks 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Grayjay seems to fix things real fast, been using that a lot lately

[–] antler@feddit.rocks 4 points 1 month ago

Anything on the signal protocol could have an infected cilent be delivered, or backdoor server side by providing the wrong keys.

Facebook might comply. Would guess that Signal would refuse and would be hit by some absurd fee like 100mil a day for not complying and be forced to pull their services out of the UK.

[–] antler@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 month ago

We also share aggregated, non-personal data and related usage information, which does not contain any personal information which can identify you or any other individual user, with third parties, including content providers, website operators, advertisers and publishers.

https://getpocket.com/privacy#sharing

From the pocket privacy policy

[–] antler@feddit.rocks -1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

... and they're tracking your searches, collecting massive amounts of telemetry, and using pocket that collects and sells your data.

view more: next ›