admin

joined 1 year ago
[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah fair enough. Key part was "arcs that go nowhere". I got so incredibly tired of TV shows that think the way to do mystery is drawing out plot far too slowly, in hopes you'll tune in next episode.

Then again, regarding new trek, I only watched season 1 of Discovery, and the first episode of Picard. I ain't got no patience for this.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 1 points 1 day ago

The token limit for gpt 4o is over a million. Wtf.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 22 points 1 day ago (4 children)

And most important (for me): self-contained episodes. No season long story arcs that go nowhere.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's a a bit too absolute way to look at it.

From their point of view the goal isn't to abolish human involvement, but to minimise the cost. So if they can do the job at the same quality with a quarter of the personnel through AI assistance for less cost, obviously they're gonna do that.

At the same time, just because humans having crappy jobs is the current way we solve the problem of people getting money, doesn't mean we should keep on doing that. Basic income would be a much nicer solution for that, for example. Try to think a bit less conservatively.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 2 points 1 week ago

I'm not sure how long ago that was, but LLM context sizes have grown exponentially in the past year, from 4k tokens to over a hundred k. That doesn't necessarily affect the quality of the output, although you can't expect it to summarize what it can't hold on memory.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

troed:

It's problematic when people conflate their gut feelings for facts.

Also troed:
I understand activitypub better than creator of Lemmy

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, that convinced me. Thanks for your insight on the matter, I now know how to value the rest of your comments.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 1 points 1 week ago

It has been five years since it was created though.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And in one of those cases they are violating a very clear "this is not okay" signal, and in the other they are not.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

What I think or what they "may" do is irrelevant regarding public data. What matters is sending a clear signal what you are and are not okay with.

Whether you actively participate in helping them get your data or not might not effectively matter in them acquiring it, but it may heavily impact the fine they get for it afterwards. You might be okay with them getting your data for free, but I'm not, sweet summer child.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

They can still train ML models (create profit) from the data they get from you without consent.

 

In a blog post released on Monday, VP of Privacy Sandbox Anthony Chavez said that Google is “proposing an updated approach that elevates user choice” by allowing users to select whether or not they want to enable cookies on Chrome and adjust that choice “at any time.”

“Instead of deprecating third-party cookies, we would introduce a new experience in Chrome that lets people make an informed choice that applies across their web browsing,” Chavez wrote.

view more: next ›