Does outlook actually produce useful error messages? My institution uses it and I have never seen it do anything useful. #sympathyfortheidiot
Wigners_friend
joined 3 months ago
If that were actually happening it would be astounding. But they never measure the particle in one arm and the spin in the other in the same run. They conduct different experiments for the two results. The two experiments have different conditional probabilities. In the first run the particle can only be in one arm of the experiment. The changes made for the "grin" experiment break this condition though. So the particle can be in the same place as the "grin". In short, there is no evidence the property was dissociated.
But there's nothing interesting in the quantum Cheshire cat, just fuss and noise because people don't understand conditional probabilities. So the "quantum eraser" all over again.
Them: this time we will discover supersymmetry.
Narrator: they won't.
Yes, "common sense". The interesting thing about science is how often it tells you "common sense" is horseshit. Try get through a physics degree on "common sense" and we can discuss exactly how stupid you are.
It's okay, they aren't capable of "intelligence" actions anyway....
Wavenumber
You could have stopped at "no formal education" .... he probably can only type like archeologists understand hieroglyphics (buttons for gaming mysteriously also provide communication)
I don't think you understand why he left. Just look up the timeline... apartheid had the writing on the wall. Racist muskrats mysteriously flee to Canada because "the blacks" might atain self governance. It's like they don't understand rational eugenics...
I live in SA. Care to back up the royalties claim?
view more: next ›
The equations emerge from thin air without justification. Free parameters abound so anything can be fitted. The primitive variables seem to imply non-fundamental physics. How does a "recursive" field have pressure or tension? These imply it's made of something? Moreover, your equation's units make no sense. Looking at your simulations, you are tuning the free parameters by hand to get vague agreement with data. This is entirely unserious.