WatDabney

joined 10 months ago
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'll take that as a yes.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 11 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Do Russians (and western Putin supporters for that matter) have an unusually high rate of domestic violence?

It strikes me that this whole spin that Ukraine "provoked" Russia's invasion is basically identical to the stereotypical wife beater's claim that she "provoked" his violence.

And I wouldn't be surprised if people who tend to believe the one tend to believe the other too.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I hadn't put it together before, but Israel is sort of an international case of affluenza - a spoiled, indulged rich kid who ends up a psychopath because daddy's money has always given them whatever they want and shielded them from ever having to face the consequences of whatever they do.

It's long past time to cut off their allowance.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

More precisely, Israel is finally admitting to what has been the plan all along, while trying to pretend that it wasn't the plan all along.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

And Netanyahu's obvious provocation strategy is playing out exactly as intended.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'd say more the latter, but people are multifaceted, so it's likely not quite the case that it's people being their true inner selves as just indulging a part of their true inner selves.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oog.

Lovecraft was very imaginative, but he was a medocre writer at best, with prose that's alternately stilted and self-consciously purple.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Let's not kid ourselves - Israel will target whatever and whoever the fuck it wants to, entirely regardless of possible consequences, and the US won't do anything meaningful about it, ever.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 weeks ago

Well, he is the bestest and most smartest president in the whole history of ever.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 31 points 3 weeks ago

For anyone who still has any doubts about who the real groomers and pedophiles are, the far right is now essentially putting up blinking neon signs announcing that it's them.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

On a bit of a side note:

Dimon announced earlier this year he would not make an endorsement prior to the 2024 election.

In August, Dimon wrote in The Washington Post, “We live in a perilous time. Deeply divided, our nation now faces both challenging domestic issues and perhaps the most complicated geopolitical situation since World War II. We may be at an inflection point that will determine the fate of the free and democratic world for decades.”

Though my take on all of that is much more cynical than his, I agree in principle.

We need to elect a president who is dedicated to the ideals that define and unite us, and who is committed to restoring our faith in America and our indispensable role in the world.

And I can see why he won't endorse anyone - because that person isn't a candidate.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 29 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Identity in general doesn't matter much on forums (as opposed to microblogs, like Twitter or Mastodon). Forums are focused on topics rather than people, and what is said is generally more important than who says it.

 

I've made no secret of the fact that I think that Biden is and always has been (including in 2020) a weak candidate, and that now is not the time to gamble on a weak candidate, especially after the debate just made him appear that much weaker.

But it just struck me that in the unique and bizarre situation in which we find ourselves - running against a brazen criminal with a stated goal of being a dictator fronting for a group of christofascists who already have a playbook for destroying American democracy - Biden has a built-in advantage as the incumbent.

I don't mean the advantage that incumbents are generally presumed to have (he notably does not have that), but a much simpler and more immediate one.

It's disturbingly likely that if/when Trump loses, his christofascist coattail-riders and his legions of angry, hateful and generally heavily-armed chucklefucks are going to literally go to war. They could well end up making Jan. 6 look like the peaceful protest they insist it was, at least in comparison to the violence and bloodshed they'll potentially unleash should their fuhrer lose.

And at that point, it's going to be much better to not have to deal with a transfer of power - to have a president already in place with a full set of aides and well-established communication channels, and to keep that president in office for as long as it takes to withstand the fascists.

As I said, that just struck me, and I haven't fully analyzed it, but I think it has some merit.

And never in my life did I think that things might reach the point, at least in my lifetime, at which I'd be considering the best strategy to combat an impending bloody fascist coup in the US...

view more: next ›