Viri4thus

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] Viri4thus 3 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Oh, I see. I thought they had backtracked on that.

[–] Viri4thus 20 points 6 days ago (6 children)
[–] Viri4thus 2 points 6 days ago

Schadenfreude intensifies!

[–] Viri4thus 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I hope PMCs will provide a future free of war

Are you for real? The same PMCs who instigate wars like this one to make bank?

[–] Viri4thus 23 points 6 days ago (8 children)

Pausing the sony bad narrative for two minutes. Where the fuck was all of this outrage when Rockstar, Ubisoft, EA, Actiblizz and so on did the exact same for over a fucking decade? Why is sony the straw that beoke the camel's back when theirs isn't even the worse requirement? Shit, I still have PTSD from GFWL.

[–] Viri4thus 1 points 1 week ago

Tell me you didn't open the links without telling me you didn't open the links. Have a nice day friend.

[–] Viri4thus 3 points 1 week ago

Keep it, 1000€ for a console is a ps3 level cunt move. The clear concessions done in the design of the hardware indicate the price point of this was much lower in the design phase destined to compete with the X-S combo. Sadly, MS gave up the hardware game when their clear dumping attempt didn't work as expected and we're now left holding our dicks while sony tries to dig their claws in our wallet.

[–] Viri4thus 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

https://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel-core-i7-8700k/16.html

https://www.techpowerup.com/cpu-specs/core-i7-6700k.c1825

Ryzen was not more efficient than skylake. In fact, the 1500x was actually consuming more energy in nT workloads than skylake while performing worse, which is consistent with what I wrote. What Ryzen was REALLY efficient at was being almost as fast as skylake for a fraction of the price.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-M3-Max-16-Core-Processor-Benchmarks-and-Specs.781712.0.html

Will you look at that, in nT workloads the M3 Max is actually less efficient than competitors like the ryzen 7k hs. The first N3 products had less than ideal yields so apple went with a less dense node thus losing the tech advantage for one generation. That can be seen in their laughable nT performance/watt. Design does matter however, and in 1T workloads Apple's very wide design excells by performing very well while consuming lower energy, which is what I've been saying since this thread started.

view more: ‹ prev next ›