V0ldek

joined 10 months ago
[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 9 points 1 month ago

As the AI bubble weakens, he only gets stronger.

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 19 points 1 month ago

Also, Musk would’ve been much better off commissioning someone to make the image he wanted rather than grabbing a screencap Aicon openly said he was not allowed to use

Well, Musk is famously great at taking a no as an answer.

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 13 points 1 month ago (11 children)

It’s kind of weird anyway to have a child with someone random, isn’t it?

In my mind "being inseminated by" is like 1% of "having a child with", if that. It's probably the least consequential thing your father may do in your overall upbringing.

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (16 children)

The thing with IVF is that it's already incredibly weirdly eugenicist.

Like, read some of the parameters they'd screen you for if you wanted to donate sperm. You get bonus points for having a PhD? I'm sorry? You're looking for a better-educated sperm?

And when you apply for IVF and choose a donor you get their education and job. "I want my cum to be a pilot!" The fuck.

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 4 points 1 month ago

has a plan to profit

You say "plan" but I think what you really mean is that Satya crossed his fingers and hoped for the best

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago

MS is doing the laughing as every company scrambles to adopt AI purely out of fear of being left behind

Hey man, as someone who literally worked at MSFT in Azure Identity a year ago, let me assure you, this is exactly what MSFT is also doing while their devs scratch their heads in bewilderment on how on earth they're going to incorporate genAI into the auth token service.

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 17 points 1 month ago (16 children)

but they must be making money off X if they’re doing this.

is such a laughable, ridiculous thing to say, like what the fuck dude, where did you get this idea from even

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The what in the what now?

What a terrible day to tech.

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There's no way this works, right? It's like a 5y.o.'s idea of a gotcha.

This would be like starting a tax-exempt charity to gather up a large amount in donations and then switching to a for-profit before spending it on any charitable work and running away with the money.

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 6 points 1 month ago

the second is characteristically christian and associated with dignity culture.

homeless people bear the imago dei. they are not intrinsic moral superiors but their plight is a shame to us because it denudes them of the dignity that should be theirs by right of their humanity.

Lol yes, that's exactly the way mainstream Christians view homelessness, their lack of Work Ethic :tm: is a "shame to us". Lmao even.

Christian charitable organisations are so well-known for their ethos of inherent human dignity.

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Jesus GNU Christ, Live your life so that no one ever produces a systematic classification of your opinions that looks like this

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 10 points 1 month ago

I am so cynical at this point I am fully bought into the idea that these chowderheads don't even interact with reality, just with the PowerPoint and Jira-driven shadows on the wall.

view more: ‹ prev next ›