Ullallulloo

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

1 John 2:18 uses it both as a proper noun and as a generic noun, and nowadays "Antichrist" is more a colloquial name for the first beast of Revelation 13 even if that's not directly what the text clearly calls him.

Regardless, I agree Trump is very anti-Christ. Hard to read 1 John 4 and not see almost the opposite of him.

[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Which ballots are those? You think RFK has any chance of flipping California?? (Or New York for that matter?)

[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 0 points 1 month ago

It was literally called "The Last Supper On A Stage On The Seine".

[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

People want to claim the drag performance was making fun of “The Last Supper”

By their own statements, that was their actual intention though.

[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 4 points 1 month ago

He's always been the leader. This is just a change in titles to eliminate the vacant lower position.

[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So, exactly what you get from Amazon?

[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 2 points 1 month ago

The CHIPS plants just started being built a few months ago. This is bad for the employees and short-term investors, but long-term Intel will be fine and the plants will be a net positive to the country.

[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The stock is down 30% so far, so I think you may not understand investors very well haha

[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 1 points 1 month ago

I mean, it just comes down to entertainment ability. Some podcasts like Spitballers can talk about random stupid stuff and make it hilarious. Some podcasts just try that and…don't quite pull it off.

[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This nonsense is about one step away from affecting Invidious too.

[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 4 points 1 month ago

No, it criminalizes anything created involving a computer that is realistic-looking.

[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 79 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In other words, it is an authorized copy.

 
view more: ‹ prev next ›