both works. Just do not forgot to assign fake serial numbers if you are passing disks. IMHO passing disk will be more performant, or may be just pass HBA controller if other disks are on different controller.
TheHolm
joined 1 year ago
Just imaging how much pollution this bikes on road generates, it would be way better if they continue driving.
ZFS or BTRF mirror will know which side is at fault due to checksums. I'm more concern about simultaneous falures of two disks. Rebuilding of a RAID puts lots of pressure on remaining disks, so probability that remaining one dies too is much higher. with RAID6 3 disks need to die to lost date, which is less likely but not impossible.
I would not trust these kind of dives in the mirror. IMHO RAID6 is the only way.
LE only certify your domain name, you may want to put more (like company name) to cert and it is where classic certs providers come to help.
ZFS ZIL will not help in this case.
Usually it can be solved by talking to hotel stuff. you are paying for that service and can expect it be suitable for any legal use.
trouts are for Englishman. Aussie prefer whales.
Nope. You do not need physical access for it, just root access. and you HW is compromised with only means to recover it is SPI flashing of CPU.
They are definitely not giving a f^&* over radiation belts. Polaris dawn and now this one. But we need know orbit details to be sure.
3600 was released in 2019. And it they was making it for at least 2 years.
This is why we need nuclear as main green power source.