Taniwha420

IRC one of mushrooms' main effects is to increase seratonin levels, so ... Yeah, same basic thing.

The prevailing sentiment was that the Japanese would not surrender until their home islands were totally conquered. Their government was in the process of preparing the civilian population to fight to the death. (Research the invasion of Okinawa if you want to know what a US invasion of the main island would have been like.) In a version of the trolley dilemma, the American rational was that the loss of life in two horrific attacks that would shock the Japanese into surrender was less evil than the alternative of invading their home islands.

I'm not making that argument, or saying there were no alternatives, just that the Americans were weighing the loss of life (including civilians) involved in a nuclear bombing against the loss of life (including civilians) in invading the islands.

Notwithstanding other unthought of solutions, the strategy worked, and the apparent alternative would have been brutal.

No. That is not a member of the order of Hemiptera at all. It is an Orthopteran.

Daft Punk dropped a new track?

IMO it's tennis for Boomers who can't hack tennis anymore.

That is such an overly simplistic and reductionist take. I'm not even sure the most control and fear oriented, "OT" Christians would accept that interpretation. I'm not even sure that there are any hardcore Jews that would accept that interpretation.

From a Christian perspective, Jesus is evidently non-violent and encourages non-violence ("those who live by the sword, die by the sword," "let he who is without sin cast the first stone," and his refusal to start a riot in Jerusalem when he's being tried.)

Also, I'd take your Matthew quote as Jesus seeing himself as in conversation with the Jewish corpus of teachings, not divorcing himself from it. He's evidently NOT ok with the blind implementation of OT teaching. Anyway, I've got to clarify that the translation of Torah as "law" misses a lot of nuance. "Teachings" might be a better translation. "The Law and the Prophets" is basically shorthand for what Christians would call the "Old Testament".

He obviously interpreted and prioritised Old Testament teachings to place love, mercy, and redemption at the heart of interpretation, so to say that, "Jesus wants you to kill your non-Christian family," is absolutely disingenuous.

They used a drone to spy on the New Zealand women's team. That violated fair play. The article mentions the coach (?) saying that drone use was not limited to the women's team or soccer. I wonder what else will come out?

EDIT: I got a couple things wrong. Here's the actual quote: The head of Canada soccer has acknowledged the drone use was not limited to the women's team or to Paris.

What?! Where do you get that?

Australia: punching way above its weight class.

...

It's the Vegemite, I'm sure of it.

I believe that "Indian Giving" is sourced in a cultural misunderstanding between Indigenous and European societies. Indigenous societies were reciprocity based, so giving gifts should be reciprocated with a gift of like value to strengthen relationships, or increase honour (social standing). The Europeans were working in a patron-client system so a gift was seen as a way of purchasing access to power through a patron. The Europeans thought the Indigenous people were paying for access to power (like a tributary), so there's no expectation of returning a like gift. The indigenous people thought they were entering into a mutual relationship, and when a like gift wasn't returned that was seen as reneging, so they took back their 'offer'.

Glad to have an anthropologist kick my ass.

Now draw a fire holding the woody species.