Soyweiser

joined 1 year ago
[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 12 points 4 months ago

Careful, that might cause the humanbiodiversity posters to react and draw lines on maps! (Is that still a thing? I can't recall seeing much HBD posters anymore, likely my own bubble of course).

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

iirc Yud and lesswrong is also more of a sidenote in that essay, as the thing is about Neoreaction. A think Yud used to be not that a fan of (and that might even be in the essay itself). Perhaps the shift in attitudes towards LW can also be explained because they are more and more accepting of things like NRx and the line between them is made less and less clear. For example see this article esp the part about neoreaction a basilisk ;).

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 16 points 4 months ago

Would also be great if the article he talks about doesn't start with "I no longer endorse all the statements in this document.[emp mine] I think many of the conclusions are still correct, but especially section 1 is weaker than it should be, and many reactionaries complain I am pigeonholing all of them as agreeing with Michael Anissimov, which they do not; this complaint seems reasonable. This document needs extensive revision to stay fair and correct, but such revision is currently lower priority than other major projects. Until then, I apologize for any inaccuracies or misrepresentations."

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 13 points 4 months ago

I regret to inform you that Trace is hate-reading awful.systems too & has posted this comment on their Twitter.

Surely out of the interest of Rational Fair And Balancedness, he will link back to this place in his article. Surely, he has already done so before I mentioned this.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The lesswrong Rationalist sphere people all write like this. ~~And I assume he gets paid via various podcasts/substack subs/a patreon. So this is prob mostly their job.~~ Correction he has a day job as a law clerk. My bad sorry.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 13 points 4 months ago (5 children)

or is there some weird-ass chess proxy-fixation among the rats that I have thus far been blessedly unaware of?

Iirc ssc has written about it so yes

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 16 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Judit Polgár

Sadly, I know where this goes, they will just point out she is Jewish and point to that. (I think SSC even did that).

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

Yeah see also his denouncement of Roko's Basilisk (ctrl-f the page), we know it wasn't that important, the funny part was that it was a dumb rehash of Pascals wager, and that at the time Yud took is very seriously.

Wood also doesn't seem to link to the actual Rationalwiki article which also makes clear that Yud doesn't really believe in it (probably). It also mentions just how few (but above the 5% lizardman constant, so cause for concern, if they took their own ideas and MH seriously) people were worried about it. And every now and then you do find a person online who does take the idea seriously and worries about it, which is a bit of a concern. So oddly they should take it more seriously but only because it wrecks a small percentage of minds.

It is weird to not mention Yuds freakout:

Listen to me very closely, you idiot.

YOU DO NOT THINK IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL ABOUT SUPERINTELLIGENCES CONSIDERING WHETHER OR NOT TO BLACKMAIL YOU. THAT IS THE ONLY POSSIBLE THING WHICH GIVES THEM A MOTIVE TO FOLLOW THROUGH ON THE BLACKMAIL.

There's an obvious equilibrium to this problem where you engage in all positive acausal trades and ignore all attempts at acausal blackmail. Until we have a better worked-out version of TDT and we can prove that formally, it should just be OBVIOUS that you DO NOT THINK ABOUT DISTANT BLACKMAILERS in SUFFICIENT DETAIL that they have a motive toACTUALLY[sic] BLACKMAIL YOU.

And pretend this was just a blip and nothing more. Mf'er acted like he was in Stross novel.

(Also after not clearly sharing the information about Roko's Basilisks history, and we sneer at it, I came across this sentence: "then cites his pet article on Roko’s Basilisk directly while giggling about how mad it made Yudkowsky fans." lol, no selfawareness there wood).

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The comments are quite a selection of typical things. 'harassing innocent IQ researchers' 'the sneerclubbers are all losers who hate crypto' etc etc. Hitting the familiar beats.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 6 points 4 months ago

I'm sure we'll do this all again soon enough.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 11 points 4 months ago

Puritan America values strike again.

Just got an acausal message from the future. 2025 will be shocking, we have seen nothing yet. And sadly I don't think we in Europe have it in us to do a D-day to save the USA from the fascists.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Contained such wonders as : H2O12

view more: ‹ prev next ›