SmoothSurfer

joined 1 year ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
0
Where can I learn algorithms and data structures? (lemm.ee)
 

I know this can be easily searched over internet, but I want to know your experience. I don't want a medium article listing algorithm courses.

I found Algorithms from Princeton University in coursera, but course is too old and many resources they have provided are not working right now. I would apprentice it if you could share more of an video type resources because I am not good with programming books, I can not focus them.

Thanks in advance...

Priorities! in c/memes@lemmy.ml
[–] SmoothSurfer@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No one is more hated than he who speaks truth

How do people sleep on planes? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
[–] SmoothSurfer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I am gonna be honest with you here. Some of us born with a gift, given directly from god. They can sleep, without thinking embarrassing memories, without using any medicine, without finding comfort itself. But you and I... and many others... we are not welcomed to this dream world of easy sleepers. We are not gifted.

1
To what extent can I be skeptical? What is our limit of comprehension? (lemm.ee)
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/3172656

Couple of days ago I saw a post about on atheist community about a quote saying atheist can't base their morals on anything.

I commented that if religion didn't accept some premises like god, they wouldn't either. Some said I am wrong and downvoted me. So I decided to post here about to what extent can I be skeptical about premises, to see where I am mistaken (or commenters).

Before that post, for a while I had an idea that even the analytical truth/necessary truth (whatever you name it) like "a is equal to a" are premises which can not be proven (since they are the basics of our logic, which will we be in use to prove claims) even though they seem us to be true by intuition. They just have to be accepted to be able to further think about other things.

So my question is since we can question the correctness of basics of our logic and cant find an answer, we can not justify or learn anything. Also, there lays the problem of do we really understand the same thing from the same concepts, and does language limit us?

If I am mistaken, which is highly probable, please correct me and don't judge. I am not much of a philosophy reader.

I would really appreciate it if you could share some resources (video, article, book, anything...) about limits of our understanding, logic, language and related topics.

Thanks in advance...

1
To what extent can I be skeptical? What is our limit of comprehension? (lemm.ee)
 

Couple of days ago I saw a post about on atheist community about a quote saying atheist can't base their morals on anything.

I commented that if religion didn't accept some premises like god, they wouldn't either. Some said I am wrong and downvoted me. So I decided to post here about to what extent can I be skeptical about premises, to see where I am mistaken (or commenters).

Before that post, for a while I had an idea that even the analytical truth/necessary truth (whatever you name it) like "a is equal to a" are premises which can not be proven (since they are the basics of our logic, which will we be in use to prove claims) even though they seem us to be true by intuition. They just have to be accepted to be able to further think about other things.

So my question is since we can question the correctness of basics of our logic and cant find an answer, we can not justify or learn anything. Also, there lays the problem of do we really understand the same thing from the same concepts, and does language limit us?

If I am mistaken, which is highly probable, please correct me and don't judge. I am not much of a philosophy reader.

I would really appreciate it if you could share some resources (video, article, book, anything...) about limits of our understanding, logic, language and related topics.

Thanks in advance...

And theirs are based on racism in c/atheistmemes@lemmy.world
[–] SmoothSurfer@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be honest there really is nothing to be the base of anything, if we dont take religion as base. Since religion is a given idea by a being which is ontologically higher than us, it is logical to base everthing on it; but first you have to accept it, where the problem begins.

This mat seem too much skeptic, indeed radically skeptic but you can not justify any premise you make. Even the basic logic like, a is equal to a. Many things may seem intuitionally true but when you try to justify it, you cant.

But here we are, i have a stomach which wants food, i have a mouth which wants to talk, i have dick/pussy which wants to fuck. We are a society, and we are here, we want to be together. So we need some limits to live together. Thats how we create our fucking morals.

[OC] sxw - Simple X Widgets in c/unixporn@lemmy.ml
[–] SmoothSurfer@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everything seem to be neat but there is just one thing i couldnt bare with, please place play buttons icon just a bit right, i am sure it is in the center but since the left part is bigger it may seem better if it is near to right

6
This got me thinking which button to click (lemm.ee)
 
"Progress" in c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world
[–] SmoothSurfer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I highly doubt OP knows what quotes mean here