RedStrawberry

joined 1 year ago
[–] RedStrawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are those plasters I see? Too many people forget those😂I've ended up awkwardly searching for one after an accident cooking or paper cut one too many times Always stay prepared

[–] RedStrawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 92 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Exactly! Government granted 'porn credits' sounds absolutly insane as a serious idea...

Porn "Enthusiasts will be able to request extra credits" is one wild sentence.

A porn "enthusiast", requesting the government for porn credits, to watch porn? What?

[–] RedStrawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Edit: spelling & TLDR; Sorry for the lil'rant, don't intend this as an attack or to be so long, thoughts just flowed :/ don't read if ya don't wanna

Mandated parental controlls options would be pretty amazing, and relatively easy to implement. Honestly i'd love it. But requiring parents to use them? How do you prove that without another privacy nightmare? Parental control's effectiveness depends a lot usage, a few slips an it's for naught. Plus how would the regulators know what devices the children use? Or if they use/have them at all? Or if parents pay attention to parental controls - if its not just a cardboard vault?

I think the problem is legislators know this and 'terroists' are probably the easiest kinda legitimate attack they have on online privacy. That or they're so tech ignorant they're automatically applying how they'd usually restrict stuff like alcohol/drugs, so regulate the seller/vendor/whatever — not thinking of any more nuanced approacea.

Ultimately its probably best left as a 'educate people, hope for the best' thing. Added to some help from - like you said - mandating parental control implimentation, tightened child neglect/abuse regulation or damn education/schools needs a ton of work too. Maybe make website blocking easier for less tech literate on home networks too. Parent's responsibility but make forfilling that responsibility as easy as possible.

I imagine it might be possible for a parent in the UK to be sued for that already. If that parent breached their duty of care by psycological harm to they child? Maybe you could claim for negligence? I doubt anyone's tried, tbh it's a bit of a stretch and I don't know the law that well ...plus it'd be a right expensive, long process not to mention only a civil case so no criminal consiquences. Unless it's some rich guy's Fuck you case or it's an extreme case borderlining child abuse, not likely.

Sorry again for the wall of text😅thanks

And yet its all on his arm😂

I actually hope it was, if not this would be even more ludicrous... but, most letter openers I've seen aren't much sharper than butter-knifes

[–] RedStrawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Poor larry got paint splodged :(

[–] RedStrawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It is a letter opener😂

[–] RedStrawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Self-applied budget cat makup😂 They look majestic

[–] RedStrawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And reform, its bloody terrifing seeing them get so much support

Same in the UK, quite a few spam calls... odly a few that call an say nothing too - literal silence - then hang up

Found a few flees in the carpet last months ago, cleaned up, hoovered etc... then haven't seen any more since. A good clean, flee comb an a few sticky catcher-thingies should do the job fine.

view more: next ›