PumpkinSkink

joined 1 year ago
[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Liberals should be careful with this. Y'all want them to feel like Trump did alright. We can't have him being switched out at the 11th hour for a more competent candidate

[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Just to clarify, this "fourth power" rule is reasonable because that is approximately how road damage scales with per axle weight (last I checked it's not an exact integer exponent but it is about 4)

[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 52 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (11 children)

"Yeah. I really do want a big salty lugee in my mouth" ~ Oyster Enjoyers

[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Still doin better than ol' Raskolnivok. Man's would be lost without Nastasya.

[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are we sure it's cheaper though? I mean it legitimatly might not be. I have some friends who work in tech and they use an AI model for, amongst other things, summarizing information on their internal documentation. They've told me what their company is paying for the license to use this thing, and it's eyewatering. also, uhh last time I checked, the company they got that license from does not turn a profit... so it appears to be too cheap at the moment.

It might really be the case that it isn't cheaper than just paying someone a normal salary to do that work, and it probably isn't cheaper than just jamming the work being done by the AI now back onto preexisting employees (which is what they did before ~2 years ago anyway).

The other thing that makes me feel this might not be unreasonable is that everyone on the team likes the tool, except their manager, who has thrown out the idea to cut it twice now (that I know of).

[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, but because our government views technological dominance as a National Security issue we can be sure that this will come to nothing bc China Bad™.

[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I like how they get a bunch of corn-field-states but can't identify any of the east coast.

[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Who does IP serve? It seems to me it serves very wealthy people who have the legal means to protect it. With that in mind, I think we should just get rid of it.

[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

My county has very much felt it has a stake in your country, whatever country that may be. We probably enforced that stake with weapons at some point.

My countrymen spend a lot of time pontificating on how they feel about other countries. I think it is entierly welcome that people other than Americans and Europeans have some discussions about us.

I sincerely hope that some of my fellow Americans get mad about the things you might have to say about us. We very much deserve it.

[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Is he fondling the grunt's junk?

[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Nah. Poor public schools spend waaaay to much money on shit like this. Source: Have worked as a teacher in a poor public school.

view more: next ›