This lady has been divorced twice.
Not that I otherwise care. Do what you want with your life and relationships - life is complex and difficult at times. Not every relationship works out, sadly.
But for a twice-divorced lady to tell women to “submit to men,” it sounds like she herself has a problem keeping her trap shut and submitting to a man. The hypocrisy is so thick here you can cut it with a knife.
Rules for thee but not for me.
We don’t want pentagon officials to be handsome for television.
We want them to be competent.
Probably.
But ugh. What’s wrong with a printed, laminated menu‽
The wealthy people who can’t afford to own Disneyland are closer to you than they are the people who can afford to own Disneyland.
Neat, that was really helpful.
Yes, I’d simply picked my instance at random.
Isn’t Thiel gay?
What’s with these weirdos?
I don’t see the appeal of this Opus Dei shit, at all.
Basically, how can we, as humans, use our propensity for destroying entire species, but do it for the power of good, on purpose so we can eliminate ALL TICKS FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH‽
I’m relatively new to Lemmy: what instance(s) in your (collective) opinion strike that sweet spot between being a) very free speech oriented and minimally censored, but also b) not taken over by alt-right CHUDs, trashed up like 4chan, or hosting CP, gore, and all that nastiness that comes with zero moderation?
What I’m looking for, is just enough moderation to keep out the 4chan shit, but anything below that threshold of actually hurting people, pretty much goes uncensored.
I just want to use the c-word, b-word, and r-word, basically. Like, there are a lot of stories posted involving JD Vance, so…
Trump supporters don’t read, dude.
Cool, I’m done with Perplexity.