PeepinGoodArgs

joined 1 year ago
[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 1 points 21 hours ago

Sincerely,

The Universe

(p.s.: fuck regular people)

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 4 points 3 days ago

I liked mine better...holy crap that's ugly.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 3 points 3 days ago

Of all the criticisms I've heard or read against voting for Biden, this is probably the best.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 4 points 4 days ago (4 children)
[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 7 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Human beings are social animals. The only way that other people wouldn't be able to hurt me non-physically is if I were to cut myself off from my humanity.

...why would anyone want to do this?

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Mmm nah I hate it.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 2 points 5 days ago

Sheldon Whitehouse must feel vindicated af

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 1 points 5 days ago

Americans are not required to have health insurance. Generally, health insurance is tied to one's job. Perhaps OP is a business owner and has decided to forego insurance for other things? Idk. And neither do you.

Also, it's not like American health insurance is effective in reducing hospital bills to the point of being reasonable. It's a trope that health insurance is a scam because it's so bad.

Also, like all economic decisions, health insurance vs a home is a trade off, one that OP made for whatever reason. It's not something to blame them for.

And finally, it sounds like they can afford their home just fine with outfit tradeoffs.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This is ignorance and/or maliciousness.

You're implicitly generating a fantasy to say this person pays too much for their home when that information is only compared to hospital bills. Idk about you, but I don't have hospital bills every year or even every decade like a monthly mortgage. To "put myself in a situation where I can't afford my house" may mean just getting cancer or getting diabetes or dealing with another disease or ailment that I wasn't before.

So either you don't know how hospital bills can be financially debilitating. Or you do and you're blaming them for addressing their health, as if they should just die.

Which is it?

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 3 points 5 days ago

There is literally nothing any President going forward can promise without Congress completely having the President's back or the Justices agreeing with the President.

This was always true. The Affordable Care Act was met with repeated judicial challenges and survived thanks to judicial interpretation.

Regulatory rules have alsp always been subject to judicial review, especially after the public comment period. If an agency does not respond to comments, a rule can be struck down as arbitrary.

The difference now is that the courts can evaluate rules not based on scientific and administrative expertise but on ~~ideology~~ whether they adhere to the legal authority Congress granted them. Chevron deference implied that Congress gave agencies the legal authority to adapt to new situations. The misanthropes of the Supreme Court disagree because, for them, the Constitution is a dead document allowing adaptation to anything at all.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 4 points 5 days ago

Demagogues. All demagogues are populists, but not the other way around. And the former are the death of civilization. But they get their power from a demagogic society.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I could've lived my whole life ignorant of what munting was. Now I have a word to describe something I can only think, never say outloud to another living soul.

 

When kids do linear algebra or they rise to the level of GM in chess within the first two decades of their lives, such people are obviously geniuses. Their intelligence is undeniable.

But it's like moral/spiritual geniuses aren't recognized in the same way, if at all. How come their intuitive expertise isn't recognized so easily ?

 

All those things that would happen when pigs fly, are gonna happen now!

 

This is report discusses the cultural environment in which men's liberation occurs. It points out that the right has successfully weaponized neoliberal discontent to further it's anti-democratic goals. Under the heading "Self-Help Toxic Masculinists and Conspiritualists Weaponize WASH":

Self-help, already intimately intertwined with the hustle mindset, is today being infused with deeply misogynistic propaganda by far-right popular culture figures like Jordan Peterson, Joe Rogan, and Andrew Tate. [...] Through podcasts, webinars, interviews, lectures, and books, these men and others like them are using their enormous platforms to offer solutions to the so-called “crisis of masculinity”—a conservative talking point that warps the complex and legitimate social and economic issues facing men, particularly working-class men, into a rallying cry against progress and equality—in an effort to reassert male dominance, heteronormative gender roles, and traditional patriarchal family structures. To do this in a way that reaches wide swaths of people and allows for a shred of plausible deniability, they use the seemingly innocuous language of self-help and self-improvement.

Self-help and self-improvement reinforce the "neoliberal self", "an entrepreneurial subject" where "personal grown and fulfillment are said to be attained through competition with others." But, as the report repeatedly emphasizes, neoliberalism as a cultural order generates and regenerates deep, deep dissatisfaction with it.

Reading what I've read so far, I thought to myself, "What does men's liberation mean, exactly?" (I'm not sure why this community popped into my mind...but it did). Because, without this neoliberal angle, men's liberation risks thrusting men back into a misanthropic culture as feminists. Sure, that's better than being a right-wing, patriarchal zealot, but it's not truly liberating.

While I would obviously recommend the report itself, given that it's 50 pages, I understand that's incredibly unlikely. Maybe throw it in Claude and ask it some questions.

In any case, what do you think?

 
  • Chris Cross
  • Debby Downer
  • Ernesto Cattywampus
  • Francine Leanmean
 

You should know about these sites, especially for this upcoming election season, because they are referential and nonpartisan. Each website has a line about the content.

Politics

ProPublica's Represent—Find your legislators and the legislative work they're undertaking on your behalf

Fast Democracy—Find legislation in all 50 states, but we'll probably focus on legislation in our state

Ballotpedia's Ballot Lookup Tool—Know how you're going to vote before you go!

Government Sites

Congress.gov—Information specific to both the House of Representatives and Senate.

Regulations.gov—Federal agencies need your comments on their proposed rules.

Federal Register— Everyday, the government compiles a publication of proposed rules, notices of Federal agencies, executive orders and various other things. You can find it all here!

USA Spending.gov—Investigate how your tax dollars are being spent!

Federal Election Commission—Wonder who is giving how much to a particular candidate during an election? Find it here.

Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)—Not technically a government website. Has all the important economic indicators.

Reference

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy—An excellent resource about philosophy. You can dive into a comprehensive overview of logic, democracy, or whatever philosophy you can think of!.

Oxford Research Encyclopedia—A general encyclopedia

Britannica—Another general encyclopedia

 
1
Captain Planet (media.discordapp.net)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com to c/imageai@sh.itjust.works
 

Captain Planet, he's our hero,

Gonna take pollution down to zero,

He's our powers magnified,

And he's fighting on the planet's side

Captain Planet, he's our hero,

Gonna take pollution down to zero,

Gonna help him put asunder,

Bad guys who like to Looten Plunder!

 

The animating concept behind the Trump campaign will be chaos. This is what history shows us fascists do when given the chance to participate in democratic political campaigns: They create chaos. They do it because chaos works to their advantage. They revel in it, because they can see how profoundly chaos unnerves democratic-republicans—everyone, that is, whether liberal or conservative, who believes in the basic idea of a representative government that is built around neutral rules. Fascism exists to pulverize neutral rules.

So they campaign with explicit intention to instill a sense of chaos. And then comes the topper: They have the audacity to insist that the only solution to the chaos—that they themselves have either grossly exaggerated or in some cases created!—is to vote for them: “You see, there is nothing but chaos afoot, and only we can restore order!”

 
 

You better watch out You better not cry You better not pout I'm telling you why, Santa Claus is coming to KICK THAT ASS!

view more: next ›