NateNate60

joined 10 months ago
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

For many parents, it's quicker to pay $10 for Disney+ than to load up a torrenting site and download the torrents every time. As a former piece of shit bratty toddler, I can understand why many parents would rather pay.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yes and Disney will get very mad 😠😠

Think of the shareholders!!

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

You're correct. Imitating this sort of speech even outside of Twitch is essentially the meme. The joke is that streamers get so inebriated with talking to the chat that even when no chat exists in real-life they still reflectively reference it. This meme started on TikTok but it has spread into general Gen Z pop culture.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Arbitration clauses in consumer contracts should be either illegal or opt-in (not opt-out). Arbitration is only fair when two sides mutually agree to it, not when a megacorp hides it in the 45th paragraph of their terms and conditions while judges continue to entertain the absurd fiction that it's reasonable to expect consumers to have actually read, understood, and agreed to it.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I'm a bit confused here; what have they got a monopoly on?

A monopoly is a business with no viable competitors. But Disney has at least one or two competitors in pretty much everything they do.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Password is necessary for two-factor authentication. The factors of authentication are something you know (like a password), something you have (like a cell phone), and something you are (like a biometric).

An example of three-factor authentication would be this—imagine a spy going into a secret bunker. They need to scan their iris, insert a key card, and then enter a passcode before the door opens. This has all three factors of authentication; the passcode is something they know, the key card is something they have, the iris scan is something they are.

If it just sends a code to your phone, that's one-factor authentication (something you have). Anyone with your phone can get into your account. Unless, of course, your phone hides its notifications and you have a screen lock. Then that's actually two-factor authentication because you also need to know the phone PIN or have the biometric.

If it just asks for a password, that's one-factor authentication (something you know).

If it asks for your password and then sends a code to your phone, which you need a fingerprint or face scan to unlock, you have achieved three-factor authentication.

Edit: Interesting tidbit—in the USA, you can rent a mailbox at the post office to receive mail when you don't want to give out your real address. Useful for privacy reasons. I'm sure they have similar things in other countries. These mailboxes come with a key. This is actually two-factor authentication, because the keys usually don't have the mailbox number written on them! So you have to have the key and also have to know which mailbox among the hundreds at the post office it opens.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

TOTP is standardised by RFC 6238 so all TOTP clients must comply with the standard and therefore work equally well. Pick the one whose UI you like the most and is otherwise good enough for your use case and personal preferences. It's similar to arguments over CPU thermal paste—its presence or absence makes a much larger difference than the method of application.

You do, however, want to pick something that is free and open-source and also popular. Google Authenticator (closed source) definitely is a functional TOTP client but you have to trust that the Google engineers have done a good job building a secure app. Since it's Google, they probably have, but a principle in security is that you should not have to trust more people than absolutely necessary.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Yes, but this is like replacing the front door of your house with a bank vault door. Yes, it's more secure, but there is a point of "reasonably secure enough" for most people and at some point, you are just inconveniencing yourself for no tangible gain.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

It's not a hard concept. In almost every well-designed security system, the weakest links are invariably the humans

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The passwords are stored locally. You can test this yourself by turning off your WiFi or disconnecting your Ethernet cable and then going to about:logins. All the passwords will still be there.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think you're right in terms of the American spectrum. Do you have a link to the bot calling the Ayn Rand institute centre-right? I did some more digging into it.

I will happily retract my comment if you can.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Just in curiosity, what is an example of a centre-right (by American standards) source for you? I make no comment about the Ayn Rand Institute as I know nothing about it

view more: ‹ prev next ›