NateNate60

joined 10 months ago
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

To be franc (or to be billion francs), France has enough money, guns, and United Nations Security Council seats to give Haiti the middle finger

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago

If they nuke Ukraine into oblivion, they're not spending a single kopeck building it back. They'll engineer a second Holodomor to "get their money's worth" before that.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Interestingly, this law also paid the newly freedmen $100 to fuck off to Haiti

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

It's easy when you only pay workers five dollars a day, work them like mules for twelve hours a day, are building in the open desert, don't need to do environmental impact surveys, and use cheap building materials and workmanship that starts to fall apart after ten years

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

The Yakuza in Japan in past decades are a great example of what happens when organised crime does hire lobbyists

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

It was the UK that did that. In the US, slavery was abolished through straight up "property confiscation" (from the perspective of slaveholders)

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

France doesn't have "trillions". There is nothing that can be done to force France to pay, so demanding too large of a sum, even if justified, is a good way to get them to say "fuck that" and you get nothing.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 22 points 21 hours ago

It's a nuke threat. Again.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

This comment is shockingly bad taste on a post about innocent civilians being bombed to death in a war zone.

 

At least 40 were killed after missiles struck a tent camp in Khan Younis, Gaza Civil Defense officials said. The Israeli military said it was targeting Hamas operatives.

(Washington Post gift article, no paywall)

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Almost none of the people who are excited about AI know anything about computer science. I say this someone who always encounters idiots claiming my computer science degree will soon be obsolete because of AI... lol

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

There almost certainly one incident where that happened.

...and sadly, probably one where the person shot wasn't a mass shooter.

 

"Giving people more viable alternatives to driving means more people will choose not to drive, so there will be fewer cars on the road, reducing traffic for drivers."

Concise, easy to understand, and accurate. I have used it at least a dozen times and it is remarkable how well it works.

Also—

"A bus is about twice as long as a car so it only needs to have four to six passengers on board to be more efficient than two cars."

 

and every fifth digit is just put in an odd place

 

The jump in distro versions, say, from Fedora 38 to Fedora 39, is not the same as the jump from Windows 10 to Windows 11. It's more like the jump from version 23H2 to 24H2.

Now, I'm sure even most Windows users among those reading will ask "wtf are 23H2 and 24H2"? The answer is that those version numbers are the Windows analogue to the "23.10" at the end of "Ubuntu 23.10". But the difference is that this distinction is invisible to Windows users.

Why?

Linux distros present these as "operating system upgrades", which makes it seem like you're moving from two different and incompatible operating systems. Windows calls them "feature updates". They're presented as a big deal in Linux, whereas on Windows, it's just an unusually large update.

This has the effect of making it seem like Linux is constantly breaking software and that you need to move to a completely different OS every six to nine months, which is completely false. While that might've been true in the past, it is increasingly true today that anything that will run on, say, Ubuntu 22.04 can also run without modification (except maybe for hardcoded version checks/repository names) on Ubuntu 23.10, and will still probably work on Ubuntu 24.04. It's not guaranteed, but neither is it on Windows, and the odds are very good either way.

I will end on the remark that for many distros, a version upgrade is implemented as nothing more than changing the repositories and then downloading the new versions of all the packages present and running a few scripts. The only relevant changes (from the user's perspective) is usually the implementation of new features and maybe a few changes to the UI. In other words, "feature update" describes it perfectly.

 

Still just plain rectangles with text.

view more: next ›