Ethics, mainly
Name
Yean no problem :P hoped you had saved it or something
Just a guess, but no? Insults are subjective I suppose and not being able to 'insult' a country or it's people would make many discussions impossible I think.
The difference is that one belief is evidence-based, and hence a fact, while the other isn't
You don't have a link to it by chance? Would be interesting to read
Maybe not a moron, but sad. I dunno why he acts like some rethorical genius when he just evades all points people make him and instead makes up his own strawmen to argue against.
Which makes it a fact? Facts can change too
TransylvaaaaniaaaaaAAAah!
Read what I wrote again, you're close to grasping it :)
To clear things up for you, you stated that laws had nothing to do with morality, and that is false as previously seen.
But I do agree that laws might not be a source of morality, even if some laws aim to alter how people view certain matters.
Yes, but imagine it starts to transform into avoiding ADHD, and after some time avoiding gingers