Moonrise2473

joined 1 year ago
[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 12 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Why when I see a Volkswagen scirocco is always driven 2-3 times over the speed limit? It's 3 am where the fuck you're so hurry to go? "Oh I'm late for sleep, better drive 100 in a 40 risking killing someone"

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 2 points 5 days ago

The screenshot shows how useless and unreliable is the feature. How a Google product can state that the Google pixel 9 comes with a version of Android older than 14??

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 5 points 5 days ago

I accidentally activated it and It really sucked.

First, when you invoke it, it's not listening but you have to press an additional button on the screen.

Second, it's way slower than Google assistant and it fails doing the most basic tasks

My use case: I invoke the voice assistant by double tapping on the back of my pixel, then speak without watching the screen. I exclusively use two voice commands:

  1. Set a timer for n minutes
  2. Turn off the light

So when I invoked it, need to unlock the screen, press the microphone button, say the command, wait a couple dozens of seconds , it couldn't even set a fucking timer.

In the time of that I could have saved time by just doing it manually, if anyway I am forced to interact with the screen

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 36 points 6 days ago

which now operates as part of Beggars Group Digital

Wow that's a really fitting name for a copyright troll!

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 4 points 6 days ago

New elections until Maduro likes the result?

Imagine to be that unpopular that you even can't win a rigged election.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 2 points 6 days ago

I read your quote of my post and realized to have wrote in a way that's not clear. If someone gets sponsored to become a Pixel fanboy, needs to use those two hashtags

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 41 points 6 days ago

Can't wait until it gets stuck in 2 cm of mud

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

There are YouTube channels/instagrammers that exclusively review sponsored products. Bigger ones like Unbox therapy, LTT shortcircuit, and so on. Never a bad word about the shitty product they're reviewing, because it's a paid ad.

Take a look by yourself. The product they're "reviewing" is clearly non functioning e-waste, yet they don't say it to make the advertiser happy.

This is a program dedicated to influencers, not reviewers. The verge, Engadget, marques, Mr mobile, they didn't sign this contract. If Google believes that the outlet is legit, they give the review device for free without the sponsorship contract.

Edit for clarity as I didn't add a paragraph between this sentence:

When the influencer that got the free phone under this ad campaign shows the phone on camera they need to flag the post with #giftfromgoogle and #teampixel - you can use that as a hint that the review is biased

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It didn't appear for me until I reinstalled from play store

Didn't investigate more

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

big disadvantage: if installed via fdroid, it won't work on android auto

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I don't see what's the problem. It's a proposal of a sponsorship with payment in nature (the expensive phones) instead of money. If the influencer disagrees, there's no problem and they can buy the phones by themselves, Google is not forced by law to send free phones to influencers.

I don't think that all those influencers are actually playing raid shadow legends or eating factor or using betterhelp.

Google is giving free review samples to real reviewers

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm really curious about what kind of BS. Like you could search a sexy shop and have directions to go in person?

 
 

I am running this docker image: https://github.com/nextcloud/docker with a cloudflare tunnel, meaning the webserver would see all the traffic coming from a single ip in 172.16.0.0/12 .

The documentation says:

The apache image will replace the remote addr (IP address visible to Nextcloud) with the IP address from X-Real-IP if the request is coming from a proxy in 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12 or 192.168.0.0/16 by default

So I thought that this is a not a problem, as other docker images can also automagically figure out the real IP address from traffic coming from cloudflare tunnels.

In the beginning it worked fine, then it was SLOW. Like 2 full minutes to load new feeds on news, waiting ages to complete a sync, and so on. I rebooted the server on those instances, and then it worked fine for a day.

So because at the time i was running it on unraid, i blamed the lag on that OS + my weird array of HDDs with decades of usage on them. Migrated to debian on a nvme array and... same lag!

Wasted hours trying to use caddy+fpm instead of apache and it's the same, worked fine for a day, then it was slow again.

Then I wondered: what if the program is "smart" and throttles it by itself without any warning to the admin if it thinks that an ip address is sending too many requests?

Modified the docker compose like this:

  nextcloud:
    image: nextcloud

became

  nextcloud:
    build: .

and I created a Dockerfile with

FROM nextcloud
RUN apt update -y && apt upgrade -y
RUN apt install -y libbz2-dev
RUN docker-php-ext-install bz2
RUN a2enmod rewrite remoteip
COPY remoteip.conf /etc/apache2/conf-enabled/remoteip.conf

with this as the content of remoteip.conf

RemoteIPHeader CF-Connecting-IP
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 10.0.0.0/8
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 172.16.0.0/12
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 192.168.0.0/16
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 173.245.48.0/20
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 103.21.244.0/22
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 103.22.200.0/22
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 103.31.4.0/22
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 141.101.64.0/18
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 108.162.192.0/18
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 190.93.240.0/20
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 188.114.96.0/20
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 197.234.240.0/22
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 198.41.128.0/17
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 162.158.0.0/15
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 104.16.0.0/12
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 172.64.0.0/13
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 131.0.72.0/22
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 2400:cb00::/32
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 2606:4700::/32
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 2803:f800::/32
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 2405:b500::/32
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 2405:8100::/32
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 2a06:98c0::/29
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 2c0f:f248::/32

and now because nextcloud is seeing all the different ip addresses it doesn't throttle the connections anymore!

 

Another useful feature for power users that Google is killing.

They don't care about us that day they we have a problem and the solution is in a now defunct site. That doesn't generate revenue. "When People search on Google they need to find what they need on a click on the ads", the shareholders are saying

 

Because i am local admin and i'm authorized to do whatever i want, i can use process explorer.

But i want to use taskmgr.exe

The exe is signed by microsoft

 

I left the headline like the original, but I see this as a massive win for Apple. The device is ridiculously expensive, isn't even on sale yet and already has 150 apps specifically designed for that.

If Google did this, it wouldn't even get 150 dedicated apps even years after launch (and the guaranteed demise of it) and even if it was something super cheap like being made of fucking cardboard.

This is something that as an Android user I envy a lot from the Apple ecosystem.

Apple: this is a new feature => devs implement them in their apps the very next day even if it launches officially in 6 months.

Google: this is a new feature => devs ignore it, apps start to support it after 5-6 Android versions

 

From the article:

When we went to our seats, the wait staff let us know that despite the fact that the previews were playing, we wouldn’t know until the movie actually started whether we could see the film or not. If it didn’t work, the screen would just turn black. Luckily, the film went through without a hitch.

 

I swear that with each update they're adding more and more artificial stupidity

 
 

I have several TB of borg backups. Uploaded them on backblaze b2. I could immediately see how much resources i was using, how many api calls, and so on. Very easy to see and predict the next bill. I can see exactly which bucket uses more resource, and which is growing over time.

Because I'm cheap, I want to upload those files on aws glacier, which theoretically costs a quarter of b2 for storage, but API calls are extremely expensive. So I want to know the details. I won't like to get a bill with $5 in storage and $500 in API calls.

Uploaded a backup, but nowhere in AWS I can see how much resources i am using, how much I'm going to pay, how many API calls, how much the user XYZ spent, and so on.

It looks like it's designed for an approach like "just use our product freely, don't worry about pricing, it's a problem for the financial department of your company".

In AWS console I found "s3 storage lens", but it says i need to delegate the access to someone else because reasons. Tried to create another user in my 1-user org, but after wasting 2 hours I wasn't able to find a way to add those permissions.

Tried to create a dashboard in "AWS cost explorer" but all the indicators are null or zero.

So, how can I see how many API calls and storage is used, to predict the final bill? Or the only way is to pray and wait the end of the month and hopefully there everything it's itemized in detail?

 

As always, the paying user has the worst experience. "Purchase" a show, can only watch on a certain console of a certain brand, no transfers, no backups, then it suddenly disappears from the library and nothing can be done.

If media companies insist on draconian DRM, then they should pay for full refunds to their loyal customers when one day they decide to delist that specific show.

 

I am actually shocked that 25% of those shitcoin "games" didn't fail

 

Who cares if nobody can work, the important is that those illegal streams are blocked

view more: ‹ prev next ›