the whole point behind it was them making an assumption about something
What makes you think the change suggesters assumed ill intent?
The submitted PRs seem to reason improvement, not accuse the original author. I see them suggesting a change, neutrally. With (minimal) objective reasoning.
/edit: I see the later ones did. But the first one didn't. And the second one arguably didn't.
I'm not surprised unlisted content would show up. A single public or leaked link means unlisted is discoverable elsewhere than the primary listings. YouTube can't solve that. The private alternative setting already exists.
The problem with law solutions is that they only work as far as the law and prosecution reaches. Maybe the western nations will agree on common policies. Like they do on copyright for example. But will China follow? Russia? Smaller countries? Will the prosecution be active or realistically possible?
Laws are important as agreed upon baselines. But they're no technical guarantees. They're quite limited on a public, accessible Internet.
I'd actually like that if it follows good practicses. I feel like the good ones will continue to be good ones anyway, ignoring unification.
Steam Controller.
It's big enough for my long hands. And it has a ton of features and customizability.
What I don't like is the right track pad when games expect a joystick. Depending on the game controls, it can be suboptimal. (configurable to a degree with center deadzone)
If your content doesn't fit on the platforms limit, why not post on a platform intended for or accepting such content?
This form is quite irritating to read.
Fonseca died during the trial and was cleared of charges in May.
They cleared them early because they died? Could they still have ruled after death or not? If they could, there must have been enough reason to clear?
IIRC in Germany there's still an active prosecution section working on the cases (and only those). It takes a long time to go through. And we may not hear of what comes of the cases.
Mastodon user posts about rejected change suggestion to neutral pronouns. Many critical comments get posted on the old rejected PR. Someone else creates a PR to fix grammar mistakes, including pronouns, it gets merged.
Did they denounce target children before?
“Temu is designed to make this expansive access undetected, even by sophisticated users,” Griffin’s complaint said. “Once installed, Temu can recompile itself and change properties, including overriding the data privacy settings users believe they have in place.”
So just like the majority USAian app out there?
Which apps do that? Because I am certain it's NOT the majority, and very skeptical about any other apps doing that.
From the super long title, I expected The Weakest Tamer Began a Journey to Pick Up Trash to be a mediocre standard-production anime, probably isekai, like we have seen numerous in recent times.
But the first episode instantly sets a great atmosphere and tone, substantiated by great visuals, animation, world depth, and story premise. While aspects or focus points change through the journey progression, the production quality never drops.
The "tamer" and picking-up-trash aspects are only a premise and hardly important to what is happening.
It's an adventure, a youthful exploration, stemming from hardships, with discoveries of the world and people. It's slow-paced - it reminded me of Mushishi (beautiful, world-depth, character embedded in world, slow-paced).
It's a great series that I can wholeheartedly recommend.
Have you watched it? What did you think?
JP title: Saijaku Tamer wa Gomi Hiroi no Tabi o Hajimemashita
Finished airing on 2024-03-29
The original text had 'he' where 'it' was correct. Which supports part of your premise.
They also merged a change request that changed those instances alongside 'they' instances. I don't know if the original author and denier was involved, but it's certainly important context missing from OP blog post.