JustARaccoon

It's not hard to figure out, it's just not economically viable to set up a system for it when the alternative is just not worrying about ethics and doing it anyway. We struggle to get companies to pay slightly more for recycled plastic than virgin plastic, this isn't any different.

Are you done putting words in my mouth? Where did I say anything from the arguments you're fighting against? I couldn't give less of a shit what open ai wants, I'm not fighting for open ai, I'm fighting for all the artists who've been told again and again copyright infringement against big corpos is a no-no but now we have companies doing the same thing to them and it's treated as an inevitability. For all I care open ai should be investigated for profiting from data they acquired through the loophole of being non-profit.

What do any of the concerns over the way data acquisition happens have to do with open source? Open source the software, acquire the data ethically. Prosecute anyone using datasets with unlawfully acquired data to the same extent you'd prosecute copyright infringement because that's what it is. No middle ground. There's a shit ton of data in the public domain, use that instead of scouring artstation and written books from living writers. Is it not easy to sort or of less quality? Boohoo. If you want better data pay the artists and writers.

Instead of this doomerposting "we're gonna get the short stick either way might as well get something fun out of it" is exactly why we're having our livelihoods trampled over.

"it's too hard to respect copyright of all the little guys so we'll just not" is an insane take. If you can't do it ethically don't do it at all.

It's because France doesn't recognise rape on a consent basis, it does so based on the matter of forceful penetration, i.e: the person needs to resist it. At least that's what I read in a different article. It's fucked up.

Looks like a neoliberal copy of what happened in the UK elections recently where labour did the same tactics without promising big changes where it actually matters so they won not because people wanted them but because people didn't want the opposition to win. Now they're struggling with public reception because they forgot their main voter base.

And how do you think they became prosperous? You have to give people the chance to spend money to have a growing economy, otherwise everyone's keeping money for later and nothings flowing.

No they won't (or at least they shouldn't), it's meant to be local

Until they start properly filtering ads they accept they get auto disabled in my side. No weird crypto or porn ads for me, thanks.

It's less that and more the system of prejudice itself is her hero, because she never truly challenges it, and the final state of peace at the end of the books does not require fixing its problems. Voldemort was a bad apple, nothing more (according to her I'd imagine)

You cannot convince something that has no consciousness, it's an matrix of weights that answers based on the given input + some salt

They'll hinge their position on the least good faith interpretation of EU's anticompetitive lawsuits, and why wouldn't they, they make more money in between these lawsuits than they pay EU for breaking the rules.

Oh but surely those people had said something to get such an aggressive response or they weren't actual supporters in the first place, some were probably leftist moles, not me though, I support him, he will fix the US! /s