Jeredin

The video in this article brings me joy; it's just so good and fun to watch.

"Until now, observations have been difficult to interpret, but thanks to this study we can no longer ignore bipolar winds."

Outer space is anything but empty and has far more anatomy than many would expect! Our universe may not be the jungle it once was but like a desert, you just need to know how and where to find its dynamic activity.

A great video to quickly bring you up-to-date if you're following the ΛCDM vs MOND science and debates.

Some MOND proponents I've researched so far.

I've been doing a bit of searching for theories on the origin of baryon matter (including antimatter of course) and some seem to hint at quantum particles spawning from the fabric of space (but doesn't seem to theorize on how this happened) but not many focus on hypothesizing how all forms of baryon matter ether: was the default starting point (that is empty space wasn't the default origin, energy was) or that the fabric of space is the origin of baryon matter (something like: space has the blue print and energy supplies the material).

Thanks for any insight/links that focus on this question

I've read that at the center of large celestial bodies there's zero gravity (or close to). While confirmation would be nice, if true, I'm wondering how large that area can actually be and moreover, does it scale up with more mass and/or even size - that is, does the sun have a larger center area of low (zero?) gravity than the earth and so on with evermore mass. Or is that area the same regardless of mass' size?

Thank you

As a part of my growing series researching MOND and the professionals propagating their research with and around it, I'd like to introduce Prof. Stacy McGaugh - down below are associated links to him, his work both in ΛCDM and MOND.

Note: the profile and descriptions posted here (not linked) are made by me, not him - links to his research and lectures down below.

• Most cosmologists/astrophysicists study apposing theories for various reasons but Stacy was very invested in ΛCDM in his early career. But as observational research went forth in the field he found the ΛCDM predictions difficult to fit and needed evermore fine tuning, while the MOND hypothesis fit much of the observed data right out of the gate. While Stacy admits that MOND can't account for all observable data, yet, MOND's research funding is drops in a bucket compared to ΛCDM. I invite you to be pragmatic and open minded about MOND, and reflect about how much fine-tuning is necessary for Dark Matter to fit data.

Links:

• Prof Stacy MCGaugh works at Case Western Reserve University.
• His own personal website. Has so many great links, including The MOND pages, a personal website focused on MOND research, lectures, debates, as well as Dark Matter (which again, he's worked on professionally).
• A long-winded lecture that you can watch entirely for greater context, but I'll link to Stacy's portion about MOND's early development, it's predictions and the following successes and challenges: Stacy McGaugh (CWRU Astronomy) Patterns on the Sky: Galaxy Dynamics Edition
• KITP Conference 2018 - Lecture and Debate MOND vs. Dark Matter - Stacy McGaugh & Carlos Frenk. Carlos Frenk's side of the debate is linked below the video but I found it difficult to play as he has his linked at his own website - it may play for you.

My Previous posts For MOND:

• Prof Dr Pavel Kroupa