Ilovethebomb

joined 1 year ago
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 4 points 4 days ago

He is a very strange dude, isn't he?

 

This guy sound like such an utter tosser.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 week ago

You may be thinking of the cycle bridge across the harbour, they spent fifty mil or so on that, mostly on consultants.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wellington light rail was to be run along existing streets, so the amount of land purchased was going to be very low, I think most of the land purchased wastes to be for the new tunnels.

I honestly can't explain what happened with Wellington light rail, they did public outreach and surveys almost ten years ago, had overwhelming support for both light rail and a secondary Terrace and Mt Vic tunnel. The council was taken to court over the flyover project, and then... Nothing happened for about a decade.

I'm honestly at a loss to explain it.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I disagree with you there, the sunk cost fallacy is a real problem, and we are very much prone to it. If light rail had been under construction already, there would have been a solid case to make for keeping it, but Wellington had been planning and consulting for nearly ten years without laying a single piece of track.

The ferries were perhaps less of a good idea to cancel, but the whole project was massively over speced, in my view. One vessel would have been almost the same size as their entire current fleet.

 

I'm guessing the author doesn't know the difference between a BB gun and a pellet gun/air rifle, because I doubt a BB would reliably kill a pigeon.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

To be fair, Labour made an absolute pig's ear of almost every infrastructure project they had a go at during their term, it seems a bit churlish of them to complain about National turning around and building roads.

If they and our councils had actually been competent at delivering infrastructure, we'd have trams in Auckland and Wellington, new ferries arriving next year with new terminals waiting for them, as well as better rail infrastructure.

But no, that's not the world we live in unfortunately.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

According the last census, there is roughly 200k residential dwellings in the Wellington region. I can't imagine you'd get much change out of 100k to do a bulk mail out like that.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Possibly, although if an identical envelope went out to every single address in the Wellington region, they'd know something was up.

I can't imagine sending out addressed mail like that would be cheap though. How many households are there in the Wellington region?

 

I'm sure it was just a poorly thought out choice of words, but the Tsunami remark is kinda hilarious.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Yup, there's a balance to be struck here. Refusing to deliver something that is contrary to your morals is something that would very quickly lead to religious conservatives refusing to deliver all sorts of things, but if the pamphlet makes claims that are blatantly false, that's a different story.

 

Good on the postal union to tell them where to stick their pamphlet, I say.

Of course, David Seymour is upset about it.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 weeks ago

The headline kinda set up for something more dramatic, I think that's part of the problem.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I actually expected worse than 11%, to be honest.

 

Yup.

 

A major update about the meth lollies, something got lost in translation with the police I think, they seem way too relaxed about class A drugs being out there in the community.

 

Not long ago, I posted a story about someone's dog eating meth on a walk through Auckland, and now this?

Was this a smuggling operation gone wrong perhaps?

 

Honestly, the fact they even asked is pretty bad, voluntary or not.

 

God damn it, not again.

 

Some quite out of touch comments in here, I think. Saying "unlikely they would imitate the stylish apartment blocks that can be seen in the likes of Paris or Rome." when a large chunk of our population currently don't have a hope of ever owning a home is pretty elitist, in my view.

They also mention 50m2 as being considered the minimum for banks to lend to you, I live in a three bedroom house that's 100, a living space for one person can definitely be less than half that.

I really hope we can get more dwellings built that are affordable for a single person, that's something currently missing from our market, I feel.

 

Pretty grim result, but I think it's fair. I haven't felt the CBD is a particularly safe place to be for a long time, and the reason for that is some of the residents, who, to put it nicely, you can never quite predict what they will do next.

And, of course, there's the state of the infrastructure.

 

Quite a fascinating series of events actually, it sounds like the landlord/realtor has let her attitude cost her a large amount of money, and will continue to do so if she appeals the case.

It's good to see her getting pulled up like this though.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

How do you know that? You're launching an entire rocket to kill one satellite, that can't be cheap.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Starlink launches forty-ish Starlink sats every other week, Russia could deplete it's entire arsenal of missiles and, if they're lucky, cause a hole in their coverage.

view more: next ›