Hugohase

joined 6 months ago
[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It will take some time but I will answer with sources. Can you post the source used in the map i have never been able to find anything that came close.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This map underrepresents emissions from NPPs. The emissions that are assumed for nuclear are lower than everything you find in literature and are 1/5th to 1/10th of what reputable sources state. That being said, this map is otherwise a great resource and i like it very much.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 7 points 2 months ago (7 children)

I don't agree with you but either way that doesn't change the fact that nuclear is just slow, expensive and a bad idea in 2024.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 28 points 2 months ago (10 children)

There are just better/faster options...

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago

Maybe you can get something out of here

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I always use a factor of 1200 as approximation e.g. 1GW produses 1.2 TWh per year but thats very very rough.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

TECHNOLOGIEOFFENHEIT!1!!!!!!1

Wir wissen alle was ihr macht...

1
Electricity Live Map (app.electricitymaps.com)
 

Nice tool to get an idea of different electricity markets.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Love EVs, hate Musk... not sure how to feel :-/

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

AbEr eS kÖnNTe noCH wEniGer SeiN 🤓

view more: ‹ prev next ›