Hopfgeist

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Hopfgeist@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Thanks. Right now I'm away from the machine so can't look, but I'll keep an eye open for a T420 mainboard and a second CPU, then. It'll still be a decent machine, I think, with two E5-2470 V2. DDR3 ECC-RAM is also dirt cheap these days.

[–] Hopfgeist@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Certainly looks that way. As if it wasn't big enough already. In most pictures I have seen they have only muzzle brakes, but in some they clearly have suppressors. A useful side-effect may be to reduce the visible muzzle fire for night operation.

[–] Hopfgeist@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Clearly you neither read my post nor looked into what the air baffle in the T320 actually looks like. So whats your point?

[–] Hopfgeist@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Is that the same woman who said they should nuke Siberia to create a NEMP to destroy all pre-1993 electronics (apparently, anything before 1993 survives any EMP, and anything after that will be destroyed, no matter where you detonate the bomb), so Russians could again live a simple life?

[–] Hopfgeist@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's much more than a fan shroud. It's a baffle specifically designed to guide cooling air over the CPU heatsinks and the RAM modules. This kind of airflow design is very common in servers. I wouldn't trust it without, especially since the CPU heatsinks have no dedicated fans, but rely on the aerodynamic functioning of the baffle.

And yes, I know they are very similar, in fact I am quite (but not absolutely) certain that they are identical except for the actual second CPU socket. It's almost as if you didn't read my post. Even the soldering points for the second CPU socket are there in the single-CPU T320. They certainly won't have different PSU connectors. They even share part numbers for the case.

[–] Hopfgeist@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure that's generally true. The ATACMS that were used operationally were the shorter range versions (M39), because these have more submunitions, which maximised the destructive effect on the airfields in Berdyanks and Luhansk. But I think longer-range versions (M39A1 and M57) will likely also be provided, as they reach their end-of-life, as Jake Broe explains.

That article is also six weeks old and talks about a decision to be taken "in two weeks". Which I think was still "no" at that time. Also, the "relatively easy" range reduction was just a theoretical answer, and German thoroughness means that it may take a few months, anyway.

We'll see what these great news from Germany are that Kuleba hinted at yesterday.

[–] Hopfgeist@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

I'd have to check the baffle shape again. But thanks for the insight.

[–] Hopfgeist@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thanks. And speaking of reduced range, my understanding was that delivering shorter-range versions required extensive and time-consuming technical modifications, and delivering the normal long-range version was contingent on the US delivering ATACMS. Again, just rumours.

[–] Hopfgeist@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I read that they could use the same mounts and interfaces as the Storm Shadow, but that may have been wrong.

[–] Hopfgeist@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Judging from the number of WW2 bombs still found in Germany today, things like this will remain a legacy for a century or more.

[–] Hopfgeist@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Nice. I hope they get enough supply, logistics is not trivial for this kind of operation.

Oh, and also, ~~manegerie~~ menagerie.

[–] Hopfgeist@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

When you fire, you create a huge flare, that can be easily detected and may draw counter-fire. So fire all that you want to fire in as short a time as possible, then pack up and leave.

view more: ‹ prev next ›