Electoral reform is one of very few things -- possibly the only thing -- that could actually avert this otherwise inevitable result. If Carney delivers on housing and pulls an economic miracle out of the hat I've never seen him wearing, we'll maybe defer payment for another election cycle, maybe two.
We probably don't have that long to stop systematically pitting left and center against each other, paving the way for a worse outcome that represents fewer Canadians than ever before.
The intended meaning is too easily subverted. Just ban or tax them out of existence on Canadian soil. Nothing says outsider like having to dispatch your propaganda from the outside.
It was way closer than it should have been. Over 41% of a highly engaged electorate at best saw no deal breakers in Poilievre's platform. That's got to be unsettling to anyone with any form of vulnerability or marginalized position. Nearly half of Canadians are ready to see you as an optional inconvenience under (unrelated, no less) pressured circumstances.
The battle for this nation's soul is far from concluded.
Are we just scapegoating the gov now?
As always, but only when the other side is in power.
Based on the window flashing/framing shown, I'd wager not a super long time nor terribly well insulated. But $7,500. A significant number of them is likely to get destroyed no matter how well built, so optimizing for cost is probably the right choice.
I do wonder why they're not made like "strip malls" or designed to connect with an enclosed cavity between. That would substantially reduce the area of direct outdoor thermal interface.
I'm no expert on international trade relations, but this feels like a meaningful reciprocation of our earlier outreach. It's heartening.
"Don't assume a specific individual isn't among the 30% who tried" isn't a "both sides" argument. Neither is there any pragmatism in proactively excluding someone who might already be your ally, nor in purity testing those who wish to be.
No matter how angry you are today, that anger will fade. I hope your decisions are being driven by something more steadfast.
The principle remains: judge the group for its collective behavior, but don't stereotype the individual.
I'm not terribly familiar with Brazil's politics or economics, but I'd wager they're implying the hazards of becoming a direct, unambiguous threat to (external/private) capitalism. Canada's not too big to become a banana republic, if enough forces get behind manufacturing consent for ~~war~~ special military operations.
It's "linguistic repositioning" at its finest.
I'm sure Modi will be delighted to join a coalition against authoritarianism. India would make a pretty tenuous ally -- to put it mildly.
Indeed. He was the first federal Green besides May that actually impressed me as an individual. Further, I don't think the circumstances of this election should be treated as a "normal" loss. But I don't know his prior vote share, and this time was not close. He came in last place, behind BQ and NDP candidates.
Realistically he's probably making the right choice, but I'm still sad about it. May needs a strong successor, and I got the impression he was that.