HEXN3T

joined 1 year ago
[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 24 minutes ago

i live in the same state as Mitch McConnell, so if I fear going to Japan, it's probably for a good reason.

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 hours ago

I have played every mainline game, barring the MMOs (but you knew that). The only one I haven't finished is XIII.

Final Fantasy's very nature is change. Every entry is different from the last, and that's what I love about it. I've found some--often lots--of enjoyment in all of the games. However, it's a frequent feeling that one of the games are "perfect", but with some critical flaws. It's not uncommon for said flaws to be incredibly frustrating.

Case in point.

Final Fantasy I-III are a solid trio. I like II the most, because I'm weird, but it's obvious these games are the NES ones. I still like them a good bit, and believe they're worth playing. At least, the Pixel Remaster versions are. This is true for I-VI, but the SNES games hold their own better.

Final Fantasy IV is a great balance of gameplay and story quality. It's also challenging. However, it's just a little mid.

Final Fantasy V. Excellent gameplay. Fantastic music. Interesting world. Boring plot. Gilgamesh.

Final Fantasy VI. Great music. Outstanding story. Incredibly well designed world. The gameplay is fundamentally not good enough. Suffers from cavern syndrome.

The PSX games are generally great--specifically IX--but the dungeons backpeddled hard because of the single-screen nature.

X is too.. I don't know. I love X, but something is just missing here. I don't know how to put that into words. It's probably just that PS2 jank. The game feels a little weird. Else? Beautifully executed combat, incredible progression, good enough world that still suffers from PSX syndrome, and--oh, there it is. No overworld. It's dungeons and hallways, then what is practically a PNG with dots.

XII. Incredible in all respects, but the story beats just aren't quite there. Most of the games have a more engaging story loop. Possibly the most perfect game in the series, when the only real criticism is that the story isn't perfect, but everything else is.

XIII, no. Don't think I hate it, though.

XV feels half baked, but the potential for an incredible game is there. It's obviously there. Regardless, it's fun. I liked it. I wish it was better, but I'd rather the game exist in its current state than not exist at all.

XVI. Good lord, where do I even begin? Best lore in the entire series, easily. Best protagonist and antagonist, best cast at that, arguably the best music, fun combat, dogshit progression, world and side quests. Something is wrong when the NES game has a more engaging progression loop than your literal flagship PS5 title. This is a sore spot, as I absolutely love XVI.. but I can't stress enough how absolutely agonising it is having the entire combat system offer exactly one weapon, one style of combat the entire way through. Everything is based on the eikonic abilities, which is fun, but the time spent waiting for those to recharge is the same fucking SLASH, SLASH, SLASH, SLASH, pause, repeat, magic burst. It's infuriating. This is the least balanced game in terms of the quality of its foundation, it's seriously all over the place.

I love this series, despite its flaws. It's really hard to get me to play fourteen of something, so they clearly had an effective formula. My favourite is XII, naturally. Follow with V and IX.

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I don't want to cure cancer, I want to turn people into dinosaurs!

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 6 hours ago

I don't care if it's free, take that shit out the game

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 hours ago

As a fox/hyena therian, it's foxes and hyenas. Shocker, I know. I identify with their behaviour, which is a whole thing that's too hard to put into words--they're just so me.

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

which word is supposed to be cat

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

which word is supposed to be cat

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Did anyone ever find the answer

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Fish are friends, not food

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I use it in a family recipe--clam sauce. Widely hailed as some of the best food any of my friends have ever had. It genuinely is outstanding, so don't sleep on this stuff.

 

I previously made a now-deleted post somewhat related to this topic ~~in the wrong community SHHHHHH~~. This is more broad.

Barring friends of friends, I have not made a new friend ever outside of school. As someone with a really niche personality, it's hard to be brave enough to approach new people--nobody's as weird as I am. I actually used to have a friend group that fit my personality, but it dissolved due to more drama than I can even comprehend. That's why I'm in this situation, was all of that.

I've chosen not to go to college. That'd be my best outlet for meeting new people, but I simply don't want to deal with debt. So, my time to meet as many people as possible has been cut somewhat short.

There's a saving grace, though. I'm a furry--this is the niche personality part. Cons would be great, but, to keep it short, I just don't have that capability right now. I'm not even IT yet, but my fate is sealed.

In the meantime.. I am very bored. Thanks for reading.

 

I used to use Apple Music, and never brought playlists over. Also used Spotify and TIDAL, but recommendations were never great on any of these.

 

A difficult part of writing for me is when a single sentence--especially dialogue--contains two tones. It sounds best as a single sentence, but ending with a period, or alternative punctuation, looks wrong. As well as this, using two sentences also looks wrong.

I can't think of a great example right now, but I know I've wanted punctuation that doesn't exist before. I've had moments where it would have been so useful to have a ";!" and a ";?" mark.

 

"I can't use Linux because I play this one game for a few minutes every six years and it might not work on Linux."

-Copium addict

~~Musicians are valid though.~~

38
196, 196 Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

I wonder if anyone will get this one..

EDIT: The only hint I'll provide. Coordinates.

EDIT II ELECTRIC BOOGALOO: Canvas 2024

66
Suck ya rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 

It's minging it's foken minging

 

Her name is Poptropica

 

Only 2029 kids will understand

2
Numa numa rule (media.gaygeek.social)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 
 

By far, the feature I most sorely miss in Linux compared to macOS is Quick Look. Press the space bar, see file contents. Use the arrow keys, view different files. Simple, quick, and WAY faster than opening an entire app every single time I want to check the contents of a file. I also miss the column view in conjunction with arrow keys (I’m VERY keyboard-centric, I liked being able to navigate everything with only a keyboard), but that’s less important, and probably has an easy analogue.

Most of the discussions about this that I found are older than I am (hyperbole), and I found a bunch of dead projects last updated years ago. I also found that GNOME apparently has a feature like Quick Look, but that would involve using GNOME.

I’m running Debian 12 with Plasma 5 (Does Plasma 6 have anything?) Is there any way to restore this functionality? I intend for this to be more of a master thread that anyone can visit to get help on the matter, as I’m sure I’m not the only Linux user who loves Quick Look.

Any suggestions or just talk is very appreciated.

 

🫗🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚

view more: next ›