FooBarrington

joined 1 year ago
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

You seem to be fundamentally misunderstanding my point, as I didn't mention the average person's intelligence in any way. All I'm saying is that minimizing the effort required to really try multiple distributions is a terrible way of introducing people to Linux. It will only lead to frustration and rejection. Choosing your bread doesn't require investing dozens of hours.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

No, it absolutely is hard, and those are bad comparisons. Growing up you interact with bread and cars, and you build a preference based on what you're taught and what you experience. If I go into a new store and see a dozen types of bread I've never eaten, I can still make inferences about their taste, texture etc. This is not the case with Linux distributions - if I've never used Linux before, I literally don't know what the hell I'm doing.

And it's absolutely unrealistic to expect your average person to try a few out. They won't be able to decide on technical grounds, and they'll have to use the distribution for some time to build enough experience for a preference. Going back to your car example, it's like suggesting people buy a few cars and decide which one they like (since they don't have the experience to make judgements based on short test drives) - you're asking them to invest a lot of time for something they don't really need or want.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

People learn how to do that while growing up. The same doesn't apply to software, people usually choose what they know.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's 2024 and this guy still can't read.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

Until it's "accidentally" turned back on during an update. Whoops.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's Willem, dammit!

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Hat ja bei Trump super geklappt!

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I also choose that guys dead wife

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Do you have an example where Rust devs wanted to break backwards compatibility? The complaints I've seen were mostly "I don't want to learn another language, so your Rust stuff will be broken by us"

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm not a vegan. Their argument was literally that morally there is no difference in the amount of death caused by any person for the purposes of consumption.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Ah yes, the old "I accidentally stepped on a fly, might as well exterminate the whole biosphere" defense

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Not everyone can afford a full wit. Maybe consider that not everyone has your priviledges

 

It doesn't stop. It just never stops.

 

I'm really interested in trying to get more information about Void, and one angle I haven't read much about is this: does the amount of people sacrificed, and their strength, influence the power of the resultant godhand member?

There definitely seems to be some kind of correlation between sacrifices and power, since Slan states in chapter 82: "It's ironic though. The stronger his life force and the greater his anguish, the more they become precious bread for the new life of darkness". From this we can at least deduct that a strong sacrifice makes the new member stronger than a weak sacrifice.

Now the question is: shouldn't this mean that Void is much, much more powerful than Griffith currently is? After all, he sacrificed not just a band of mercenaries (who have some very strong members, albeit only few due to the year before), but an entire kingdom. I do think the average sacrifice was much weaker for Void (as they were most likely not warriors, but intellectuals), though it's difficult to say since we know very little about his eclipse. But nonetheless I definitely think there is some correlation here.

This of course leads to some interesting possibilities for what Griffith is currently up to. Is he planning to somehow ascend further by making another, much bigger sacrifice? Do the godhand members have a hierarchy which he is trying to climb (almost certainly)? Could he be trying to surpass the Idea of Evil itself?

 

I'm re-reading the manga right now. During the Eclipse, we see the brand placed on a number of hawks, each in a different place (link to the panel):

  • Casca gets it on the left side of her chest, roughly over her heart

  • Guts, of course, has it on his neck

  • Judeau gets his on the palm of his left hand

  • Pippin has it on his forearm

  • Corkus gets his on his forehead (just like the bodies below the tower of rebirth)

I can make an argument for each of them to have gotten it on whatever they most rely on, except for Guts, I can't make a concrete argument why it's his neck.

But what I'm really interested in is this: can we learn anything about the bodies from Gaiserics kingdom from this? It might be that the population of his city wasn't made up of fighters and physical people at the time it was sacrificed, but of thinkers, or at least people who rely more on wit and cunning than on strength (positive or negative). This would make sense considering the technological and social advancements they seem to have made.

What do you guys think?

 

Everyone has something they can't stop themselves from nerding out over - but often it's hard to find people to talk to about it. So go ahead, share your interests, and tell us about them!

view more: next ›