As you wish.
The demo was a lot of fun, I'm looking forward to play to it once I've finished my latest acquisitions.
"I can't see shit!"
"Keep firing!"
Depends on who you bribe.
Problem is distance and autonomy.
You can't really command drones that far, they are programed with the coordinates, then launched. And to go far, you need to have more fuel, thus a heavier drone, which in turn will be easier to detect and target for AA systems.
And that, my friend, is a fallacy fallacy (or Argumentum ad logicam if you wish to be posh as heck).
Pointing out your opponent fallacies doesn't make yours valid. I'd also add that this is not a Stawman fallacy, as he does not attempt to replace your (absence of) argument with one that he refutes, but rather an Ad Hominem.
Edit : I'd add that yours is also an Ad Hominem, which makes it quite ironic.
The wartime version of "Ok boomer".
Your point is valid, but the insults aren't needed. Please remove them and I'll restore your comments.
Looks like someone learned about inertia today.
With those water based rockets, right ?
But how can they win this war if they don't hit civilian? Nobody win a war like that! (/s)
But a cruise missile that can change direction, maybe even hit moving targets.