Drathro

AMD with ray tracing isn't great. Not as bad as it used to be, but pretty lackluster overall compared to Nvidia (and to a lesser extent Intel's GPU offerings). Linux ray tracing via Proton is also not as optimized at present, so that can take something "passable" in windows and make it unplayable on an AMD card in Linux. If you get something overkill for the resolution you're playing at that can somewhat make up the difference.

If you're doing 1080p the 6600 is pretty solid. Or 7600, really. It CAN do higher resolutions, but then you'd need to start doing FSR scaling or drop settings to keep things smooth/consistent.

I'm just here to say Bazzite all the way. No clue what that poster meant by breaking issues or problems with rollback... Bazzite is literally designed to be the antithesis of both. The ONLY time I've had a problem with it was rebasing my laptop between Silverblue and Bazzite. Technically allowed, but I wouldn't advise it as that did cause me stability problems. I'd blame Silverblue more than Bazzite in that case, however. A clean Bazzite install has been solid ever since.

You seem to be arguing it's all about the implementation of the phoning home itself- I'm arguing that running the entire executable/binary through a virtual environment likely has far more drastic performance implications than a phone home, regardless of frequency. It probably IS mostly an implementation problem, but I'm more inclined to believe that the implementation of the Denuvo virtual environment is at fault, not just a server call and response delay. **EDIT: Apologies, forgot to include a link- see HERE. Looks like a substantial/measurable difference. Not massive, as measured here, but certainly enough that if your hardware is just barely able to run a game it could easily make or break the entire experience.

Regarding performance implications: I believe Denuvo DRM runs through a type of virtual machine environment. While this theoretically should be relatively transparent, there are definitely documented instances of it negatively impacting performance, sometimes severely. Maybe the VM it runs in is just bad with certain instructions/calls on certain CPU's or api's, hard to tell for sure. But it's not nothing.

There's an old article on the Arch wiki I used to use HERE. For simplicity I'd just always use section 2.2. Hasn't ever steered me wrong, but I'm also under no illusions that no digital data is sacred. And if it IS sacred, then it's already backed up under the 3-2-1 approach. Just make sure you know which device is which so you don't mix up "if" and "of". There's probably significantly more user friendly ways of doing it, but I guess I'm old now so I'm stuck in my ways.

Get a same sized drive (or larger) and just dd it? I used to do that all the time, even to Windows installs, if I knew a drive was starting to become unreliable. I'd advise mounting the original/donor drive as read-only to mitigate any potential data losses while transferring. But dd makes a perfect bit for bit copy of any partitions, drives, etc that you feed it. Just don't get the inputs/outputs backwards! And always remember: dd stands for "disk destroyer" because if you get it wrong, bye-bye data.

Self hosting Mealie could be a great option to take things into your own hands.

To be more clear I was more focused on the not wanting a car that needs software updates part of the argument, less so the means of delivery. Obviously, having an always on connection absolutely sucks and I'd personally be super down with just pushing an update via a USB drive or whatever like you can a BIOS update. But a lot of manufacturers have it set up so that you have to either pay a dealership to plug in the USB for some arbitrary reason, or demand the always on connection to do it. In a utopia of software development where there are no critical bugs, we would all prefer a car that doesn't need updates. I didn't mean to imply that I was arguing in favor of remote connection by manufacturers, and it's absolutely my bad in not wording it properly.

On the flip side: if a car stereo has a known firmware issue causing problems with say Bluetooth connection, I DO want the manufacturer to actually provide an easy means of fixing/updating the borked software. Better that the system was properly tested and feature complete to begin with- but I'm not delusional enough to believe we can truly have nice things.

Possibly dumb question: why not use an Authentik outpost with a reverse proxy to enforce SSO? It wouldn't be "baked in" so to speak, but it would be fully OIDC and as long as you're just running it through a web browser. Biggest downside is you'd need 2 logins (one for the outpost and one for the app). I'd assume the sso is specifically for the extra security though, so that shouldn't be a problem outside of it being a little hassle.

Remnant 2. Gotta finish Cyberpunk 2077 (again) first though. The damn DLC adding extra achievements has thrown everything off!