Cyberspark

joined 8 months ago
[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 days ago

Weird coming from the company that deliberately stop selling to 170 countries for unknown reasons.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

It's not even comparable, he didn't make something and it wasn't good, he broke what was already good. Imagine an artist adding a track to an old album and it distorting the quality of the rest of the tracks. That's what he did.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My tired brain read "Russian". My bad

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, that's my ignorance then. Woops.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

~~Being judgemental of and prejudice against people based on where they're born. I'm sure there's a word for that...~~

I can't read and lacked context. I can only apologise

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

If you don't R&D you can't tell the difference between what's shit and what just looks like it'll be shit.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Still no, because woke is something specific to the ideal of making people aware of real injustices.

Your original statement equates to "this is a deliberate attempt to push an agenda"

Even with replacing propaganda you still end up with "this promotes making people aware of real issues". Which implies 1 - an acknowledgement of the fact that they're real issues depicted (which such people usually contest) and 2 - that the author was aware of such issues in their effort to depict these things realistically.

In the end we all know that what they're saying is "this shows me something that I don't like because it doesn't fit with my vision of the world"

People can be wrong about intent and about content, but people can't be wrong about how it affects them and what messages they receive.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Not really a fair comparison when The Order 1886 dev had delusions of grandeur about his vision. About 30 fps, 1080p, repeatedly removing player agency, the QTEs everywhere, the letterbox fov that made people ill playing it, the terrible AI. The game being short was just the least of the games problems. As I recall people were done with the game even before 5 hours in.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Propaganda implies intent

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

There was a 'game' about a cube that you tapped to get to the center wondering what was inside. If I recall each install only had a few taps. Only the person to finally open it would get the prize.

The prize was supposed to be the opportunity to make a game with him and all of the profits of something, then it became just a game he would make and like $1000000, then he basically ghosted the winner without paying him. He made a shitty beta half-game thing after like 8 years, then finally just said it was done without actually making anything really playable or even charging for it.

There's viddocs on YouTube about it.

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

If Helldivers is anything to go by all they need to do is say sorry and that they'll do something on twitter and everyone will forgive and forget even if they don't do anything.

Until players start learning their lesson and not trusting these companies in the first place nothing will change. They admitted this was over sales of the upcoming black ops and it's multiplayer.

view more: next ›