CheesyFox

good luck reverse-engineering millions if not billions of seemingly random floating point numbers. It's like visualizing a graph in your mind by reading an array of numbers, except in this case the graph has as many dimensions as the neural network has inputs, which is the number of pixels the input image has.

Under no circumstance should we accept a "black box" explanation.

Go learn at least basic principles of neural networks, because this your sentence alone makes me want to slap you.

kinky

good point. i don't kill them though, silly, there are people to do it for me.

Also, unlike us, animals eat literal grass which does not require all kinds of fossil fuel machines, tons of earth-polluting pesticides, you know, stuff like that. Also we don't need to exterminate trees in order to be able to herd them, you know, that long things sticking up from the ground, producing oxygen, green all the spring, summer, and even autumn, unlike wheat and stuff.

you mean the coven?

...then it ducks like a quack

in the middle? Can you point it out? I don't see it

well, they're neither poisonous nor venomous, so the snake technically was never wrong

well duh. Not my point. It was just so funny that you actually used kinda the same rhetorics as meatlovers usually do.

Anyway, i still wanna adress your arguments. We can live without meat in the same manner we can live without plants. Good luck on getting your minimal daily value of b12 or d3. You can always get them in the form of pills, too bad animals still will be hurt for that. Fatty acids and fats are important too, as the modern studies show (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5577766/ ), what about them? My point is, you can have no meat in your diet just as you can have a meat only nutrition, both need to be adjusted with bioactive supplements.

Also, since most guys here don't know any better than simply to press the vote down button without actually answering, and you seem to be the one that actually wants to discuss the topic, may i ask you a question? How come that we blame meat industry, and i cite (surprisingly, from wikipedia page for meat), for global warming, pollution and biodiversity loss (last one actually surprised me), while it is our endless fields of wheat are the reason we have little to no forests where they were normal not so long ago, therefore less co2 being processed back into o2, and it is this very fields we cover in chemicals therefore the pollution and biodiversity loss. I mean, it almost seem like meat industry is just a handy target to blame, while certain guys can continue doing their business.

some say we can't live without meat

If you care about CO2 that much, go strangle a billionaire or two, or, i don't know, go change how our whole grocerie system works, because if you didn't know, everything we find at stores is produced with great margin. Most of the product simply being destroyed simply to keep the prices where they are.

I certainly don't care about CO2. Why? "We all die"? No, silly, some of us will (both of us most certainly), but don't underestimate our species' adaptability. And you know what, it's fucking beautiful because eight billion is a bit too much. That's a perfect self regulation kinda thing.

Its nonsense to eat that much meat. Once a month is perfectly fine.

Its nonsence to eat such overprocessed food as some of you vegans do i could say. Not that i would mean it. All I'm saying, the amount of any type of food is a matter of personal preference, And since we both live at the time when we could afford such a luxurious thing as an ability to choose what to eat, and not just consume whatever we were able to find/produce, i would like to try to enjoy this little bliss. Fuck you guys for even attempting to ruin it for me, and then telling me what to do, you brave don quixotes fighting your imaginary windmills.

sorry not sorry