CaptnNMorgan

joined 1 year ago
[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The "always has been" should have been in German

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago

It can be slick and pulling in while also squeezing so tight that it hurts. They aren't mutually exclusive

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago

He was for children.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com -5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't think that's true. Vaginas stretch out with use. You are right that if the dicks kept getting bigger, they would stretch it more, but the same sized dick can absolutely stretch out a pussy over time. My anecdotal evidence is having a sexual relationship with someone who's pussy was so tight it hurt sometimes, stopped being so tight over time, then we stopped talking for like 6 months and when we had sex again she was almost as tight as the first time we had sex.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

I watched a movie about that guy when I was a kid

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

That's ignoring a lot of context and nuance. The prequels we're bad because of the dialogue, Anakin's character development and CGI, but the story was always spectacular because it was created by one person with a clear vision. The "story" in the sequels is incoherent and an absolute mess because it's a story told by a bunch of people who didn't know where they were going when they started (or even while they were making them). Clone wars had better dialogue and fixed Anakin's character development while also telling stories created by the same person who was in charge of the movies the show is proving context for.

If Disney tried making an animated show to flesh out the sequel's, who would even be making it?

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

But they're shit because the people who work for them take all the money. With the cap greed is a much smaller factor and would likely lead to those charities to either get their shit together or shut down

Edit: and you're right in an ideal government charities wouldn't even be necessary because taxes are handling everything a charity would but it will never be perfect and I think giving people the option of where their earned money goes would be a lot less aggravating than being forced to give it to the US government

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

But doesn't that have a lot to do with the fact that millionaires and billionaires are buying property and jacking up prices? If the cap is 1 million and someone sells their house for 1 million, if they make any more money that year, it goes to taxes. That would give incentive to people to actually live life instead of being completely focused on the rat race. I don't think 1 million is a good cap, certainly not with the value of the dollar being what it is. However, I do think setting a cap and having it automatically lower a little bit every few years is a good idea. That would need to also be accompanied with a limit on liquid assets to be gradually taken down as well, if anyone is hoarding money, they would be forced to either give it away or donate to charity if they didn't want all of it going into public programs. There shouldn't be limit on what someone can buy/own.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

I've been getting them almost yearly since for 20 years and I never noticed a difference

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

It's always been a circle but I still enjoy a lunchables pizza every once in a while. I definitely don't get it if I'm in the mood for pizza but it's a good snack. I get the pepperoni and the extra cheese and make a bunch of them with a couple pepperoni and extra cheese

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

It was also temporarily called Twitter though

view more: ‹ prev next ›