BrokenGlepnir

There are two states where ranked choice exists apparently. Are these the states that the third parties are spending money in? They'd be the most likely places for them to win and show they are viable in any way.

I mean reality has a left wing bias. I'd like to see someone cute their real world experiences and get the boy to say reality is left center.

It's my turn to say it now:

Doesn't he look tired?

The larger plane needed to show dominance

I've been reading about that guy in german in 2001 as far as the extent of what two men can do with consent. The German government didn't agree, but at least he had a big meal before he went to prison.

The need for legal immunity is what sent Ceasar to March on rome.

I saw a video recently where the guy was talking about how the us navy is failing at maintenance. He explained that a lot of it was turnover. A lot of skilled labor was leaving. It took me a minute to remember, but I actually used to be employed as a contractor working on the software that did just that. I didn't make weapons, or anything that would be exported. Just software that organized ship maintenance. I wouldn't go back regardless, but the reason I left isn't the reason I wouldn't go back. I don't feel as comfortable with the military as I did a almost a decade ago when I was hired.

But why did I leave? Years of uncertainty from shut downs and funny budget fluctuations. All the comments on the video said to pay more, but I turned down a raise to get stability when I left. Myself and several people left around that same time. I assume for the same reason. They like pretending that they have broken nothing when the money comes back online. They've broken a lot of things including the "military readiness" they pretend to care about.

Really? Why did they allow those private farms at all then? My understanding was that the farms that were collectivized only produced enough for themselves to eat, so they went back a little and said "okay, you can have SOME capitalism until we get it figured out". How they figured it out was quotas, and hey, on paper it looks good. You just have to tell Stalin a good number. Somehow the store room's still empty.

If it was about verifying that votes were legitimate they shouldn't have a problem appropriating finding so that we go out to every single citizens house and ensure they are issued an ID that is to their standards (which they claim is citizenship). We know it's actually about ensuring that people who have a difficult time getting an id have a difficult time voting.

Edit. Whoops I spelled some thing wrong

That's a good point. A family doesn't just have to be your flesh and blood though. It can be your community as well, but I know I wasn't thinking that even though I should have been. I don't see much of the leadership on the trump team expressing love to even their flesh and blood even if I do apply a strict definition of family.

I don't think women in general love trump. I think that's a difficult demo for him. Sure I can find a few at his events but the average woman really doesn't like him. Does that mean he's not masculine? They are just inventing little things to be on the surface of what is and isn't masculine. Walz has the only core masculine traits I can think of. He loves and takes care of his family. Everything else is superfluous window dressing. These guys only care about dressing though.

Republicans:"democrats are trying to get ILLIEGALS to vote. We have no proof but ahhhhhhhhh!"

Democrats:"man do you remember how close they were when they were caught on video ACTUALLY STORMING THE CAPITOL BUILDING! I bet that they may try something else, like those fake electors, or....read the article"